Translate

MicroStrategy And Its Executive Chairman Michael Saylor Are Being Sued For Tax Fraud

MicroStrategy And Its Executive Chairman Michael Saylor Are Being Sued For Tax Fraud

The D.C. AG alleges that Saylor and MicroStrategy conspired to commit tax evasion by fraudulently representing Saylor’s primary residence from 2005 to present.

  • Michael Saylor and MicroStrategy are being sued by D.C.
  • The complaint alleges the former CEO conspired with the company to commit tax evasion.
  • The lawsuit calls for more than $25 million in back-taxes and penalties.

The largest corporate holder of bitcoin, MicroStrategy, and its Executive Chairman Michael Saylor are being sued by the District of Columbia (D.C.) for alleged tax fraud, per an announcement from the D.C. Attorney General.

The complaint alleges that Saylor knowingly avoided income taxes to D.C. while fraudulently claiming to be a resident of a lower tax jurisdiction while maintaining his residence in D.C. Additionally, the complaint alleges that MicroStrategy conspired with Saylor by intentionally obfuscating his real address to local and federal tax authorities.

“On information and belief, from 2005 to the present, Saylor has avoided more than $25 million in District taxes owed,” reads the complaint.

Moreover, the complaint recalls events back to 1980’s when Saylor originally founded the company, to the relocation of the company’s headquarters to avoid tax burdens in the 90’s, to his supposed routine use of yachts anchored in the Potomac River over many years.

“Defendant Saylor has been domiciled in the District, or a statutory resident of the District, or both, in each taxable year from 2005 through the present,” the lawsuit continues.

The complaint claims that Saylor also made multiple “contemptuous” social media posts on Facebook, supporting the claim that he has lived in the area from 2005 to present.

More recently, it was announced that Saylor would be stepping down from the aforementioned role of CEO to take on the position of Executive Chairman. The move was meant to enable Saylor to focus on bitcoin initiatives in the ecosystem as well as continuing to drive MicroStrategy’s bitcoin acquisition strategy. 


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Price analysis 8/31: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, MATIC, SHIB

Price analysis 8/31: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, MATIC, SHIB

Bitcoin’s technical setup leans toward an additional downside, leading some traders to exit altcoins, which are struggling at overhead resistance levels.

Bitcoin (BTC) price has been trying to change course while the S&P 500 is still giving up gains on a daily basis. Even though the United States equities markets have been grinding lower since Aug. 26, Bitcoin has managed to hold on to the $20,000 mark. 

However, investor interest seems to be shifting away from Bitcoin. That has led to a reduction in assets under management (AUM) for Bitcoin investment products, which dropped 7.16% in August to $17.4 billion, according to a new report by CryptoCompare.

In comparison, the AUM for Ethereum products increased 2.36% to $6.81 billion during the same period, indicating that investors are positioning themselves in Ethereum products ahead of the Merge.

Daily cryptocurrency market performance. Source: Coin360

Even though prices are down across the ecosystem, bear markets at least offer attractive opportunities to long-term investors. To capitalize on this opportunity, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian’s venture capital firm Seven Seven Six is aiming to raise $177.6 million for a crypto investment fund. On similar lines, former executives from Galaxy Digital and Genesis are looking to raise a $500 million fund.

Although the near term looks uncertain, long-term investors may be looking for bottom fishing opportunities. Could Bitcoin and major altcoins stay above their immediate support levels? Let’s study the charts of the top 10 cryptocurrencies to find out.

BTC/USDT

Bitcoin turned down from the downtrend line on Aug. 30 but a minor positive is that the bulls purchased the dip near $19,500. The bulls are again trying to push the price above the downtrend line on Aug. 31.

BTC/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

If they succeed, the BTC/USDT pair could rally to the 20-day exponential moving average (EMA) ($21,325), which is an important level to keep an eye on. If the price turns down from this level, the bears will attempt to pull the pair to the strong support zone of $18,910 to $18,626. A break and close below this zone could open the doors for a retest of the critical support at $17,622.

Conversely, if bulls push the price above the 20-day EMA, the pair could rise to the 50-day simple moving average (SMA) ($22,333). If bulls clear this hurdle, the pair could pick up momentum and rally toward the overhead resistance at $25,211. The bulls have to overcome this barrier to indicate that the bottom may be in place.

ETH/USDT

Ether (ETH) turned up from $1,422 on Aug. 29 and climbed back above the neckline of the head and shoulders pattern. This suggests that the breakdown on Aug. 26 may have been a bear trap.

ETH/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The bulls are attempting to push the price above the moving averages. If they succeed, the ETH/USDT pair could rise to the overhead resistance at $1,700. This is an important level to keep an eye on because a break and close above it could open the doors for a possible rally to $2,000.

This bullish view will be invalidated if the price turns down from the overhead resistance and breaks below $1,422. Such a move will suggest that the recovery may be over. The pair could then decline to $1,280 and later to $1,050.

BNB/USDT

BNB bounced off the strong support at $275 on Aug. 29, indicating that the bulls are defending this level aggressively.

BNB/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The bulls attempted to push the price above the 20-day EMA ($292) on Aug. 30 and 31 but the bears held their ground. If the price breaks and closes below the $275 support, the BNB/USDT pair will complete a bearish head and shoulders pattern. That could start a decline to $240 and later to the pattern target at $212.

On the contrary, if the price rebounds off $275 and breaks above the 20-day EMA, the pair could rise to $308. A break and close above this resistance could clear the path for a rally to $338.

XRP/USDT

Buyers have been defending the $0.32 level for the past three days but have failed to achieve a strong rebound. This suggests a lack of demand for Ripple (XRP) at higher levels.

XRP/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The downsloping 20-day EMA ($0.34) and the relative strength index (RSI) in the negative territory indicate that bears have a slight edge. If the price turns down from the current level or the 20-day EMA and breaks below $0.32, the XRP/USDT pair could slide to the vital support at $0.30.

The bulls are expected to defend this level with all their might because a break below this support could signal the resumption of the downtrend. Conversely, if bulls drive the price above the moving averages, the pair may rally to $0.39.

ADA/USDT

Cardano (ADA) bounced off $0.42 on Aug. 29 and reached the 20-day EMA ($0.47) where the bears are mounting a stiff resistance.

ADA/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

If the price turns down from the current level, it will suggest that bears continue to sell on minor rallies. The bears will then try to sink the price to the crucial support at $0.40. This is an important level to keep an eye on because a break and close below it could signal the start of the next leg of the downtrend.

On the other hand, if buyers thrust the price above the moving averages, it will suggest strong demand at lower levels. The ADA/USDT pair could then rally to the downtrend line.

SOL/USDT

Solana (SOL) rebounded off $30 and rose above the $32 level on Aug. 29 but the bears again pulled the price back below the level on Aug. 30. This suggests that bears are selling on every minor rise.

SOL/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The bulls are again trying to push the price to the 20-day EMA ($35), which is an important level to watch out for in the short term. If bulls drive the price above this level, the SOL/USDT pair could rise to the 50-day SMA ($39).

The downsloping 20-day EMA and the RSI in the negative territory indicate advantage to sellers. If the price turns down from the current level or the 20-day EMA and breaks below $30, the pair could drop to the crucial support at $26.

DOGE/USDT

The bulls successfully defended the support at $0.06 in the past few days but have failed to achieve a strong rebound off it. This suggests a lack of demand for Dogecoin (DOGE) at higher levels.

DOGE/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

A tight consolidation near a strong support increases the possibility of a breakdown. If that happens, the DOGE/USDT pair could start its downward move toward the June 18 low near $0.05. This is an important level for the bulls to defend because a break and close below it could resume the downtrend.

Conversely, if the price rises from the current level and breaks above the moving averages, it will suggest that the latest leg of the corrective phase may be over. The pair could then attempt a rally to $0.09.

Related: Potential Bitcoin price double-bottom could spark BTC rally to $30K despite ‘extreme fear’

DOT/USDT

Polkadot (DOT) has been trading below the moving averages since Aug. 19 but the bears have not been able to sink the price to the strong support at $6. This suggests that selling dries up at lower levels.

DOT/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The bulls will again try to push the price above the moving averages. If they succeed, it will suggest that the DOT/USDT pair could rally to $9.17 and then to the overhead resistance at $10. The bears are likely to mount a strong defense at this level.

Another possibility is that the price turns down from the moving averages and breaks below $6.79. If that happens, the bears will try to sink the pair to the crucial support of $6. A break and close below this level could indicate the resumption of the downtrend.

MATIC/USDT

Polygon (MATIC) rebounded off the $0.75 support on Aug. 29 and reached the 20-day EMA ($0.83) on Aug. 30 but the Doji candlestick pattern indicates indecision among buyers and sellers.

MATIC/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

If bulls drive and sustain the price above the moving averages, the MATIC/USDT pair could start its northward march toward the overhead resistance at $1.05. This level is again likely to face stiff resistance from the bears.

Contrary to this assumption, if the price turns down from the moving averages, it will suggest that bears are defending the level vigorously. The pair could then again decline toward the strong support of $0.75. If this support cracks, the pair could drop to $0.63.

SHIB/USDT

Shiba Inu (SHIB) climbed back above the important level of $0.000012 on Aug. 29, indicating that bulls are buying on dips. Buyers tried to push the price above the 20-day EMA ($0.000013) on Aug. 30 but the bears did not relent.

SHIB/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The price is stuck between the 20-day EMA and $0.000012. This tight-range trading is unlikely to continue for long. If bears sink and sustain the price below $0.000012, the SHIB/USDT pair could drop to $0.000010.

Alternatively, if the price breaks above the 20-day EMA, the pair could rally to the overhead resistance at $0.000014. The bulls have to overcome this barrier to open the doors for a possible rally to $0.000018.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Market data is provided by HitBTC exchange.



via cointelgraph.com
Twitter brings back suspended NFTs accounts as Solana threatens to pause ad spend

Twitter brings back suspended NFTs accounts as Solana threatens to pause ad spend

No official explanation was given as to why the accounts were suspended in the first place.

Early Wednesday, Twitter suspended access to nine accounts associated with promoting nonfungible tokens, or NFTs, on the Solana (SOL) ecosystem. The move comes just ahead of the highly anticipated launch of the y00ts NFT collection, a follow-up to DeGods, the most popular NFT collection on Solana, this Friday. Shortly after the suspension, Austin Federa, head of communications at the Solana Foundation, stated:

"Hey Twitter, bring back @y00tlist; I've paused all Foundation adspend until they're back. Twitter's gotta reinstate em, or show solid cause for suspension."

The said accounts have been reinstated and are accessible as of 12:00 pm EST. No official explanation was given as to why the accounts were suspended in the first place, or why they were reinstated shortly afterward. One user, DeGods founder @frankdegods, started a campaign for the restoration of the previously suspended accounts, whic garnered over 20,700 likes for a single post. Federa also commented: 

"You gotta draw a line in the sand somewhere — a lot of big Web 2.0 companies want to have it both ways — attract Web 3.0 creators, but still maintain control that's unaccountable to the community."

DeGods consist of 10,000 "virtual god" collectibles with creative outfits. Currently, the floor price of the collection is 519 SOL. The project is known for its infamous "bitch tax," which is a 33.3% tariff charged to all NFT collectibles sold below the advertised floor price. The collection recently surpassed 1 million SOL in trading volume. Its founders claim that there is a DeGod collectible owner in every single country except North Korea.



via cointelgraph.com
Get ready for the feds to start indicting NFT wash traders

Get ready for the feds to start indicting NFT wash traders

Securities and Exchange Commission regulators should move to protect investors from traders who distort the NFT market with manipulative trades — and they probably will soon.

Studies show that most people who attempt to wash trade nonfungible tokens (NFTs) are unprofitable. But that doesn’t stop them from trying, which makes it a glaring regulatory and enforcement issue for the industry. 

In wash trading, manipulators buy and sell an asset between themselves to create the appearance that the asset is in higher demand and, therefore, worth more than it would be otherwise. With NFTs, wash trading is fairly straightforward: Imagine an investor holds $1 million in Ether (ETH). The investor mints an NFT and proceeds to sell it to themself for all the ETH they own. The transaction is then on the blockchain for $1 million in ETH. The price of the NFT has been set through a wash trade to the benefit of the individual who minted the NFT.

It might be tempting to think that this is a “victimless” crime since it’s unlikely any money actually changed hands if it was a wash trade, but that’s false. By rewarding allegedly fake high-volume traders with real money, NFT investors stand to lose millions to scammers, and legitimate traders may be fooled into overpaying for their investments.

Related: GameFi developers could be facing big fines and hard time

These fraudulent transactions also drive Gresham’s Law (bad money drives out good money) in crypto, driving out legitimate investors and traders as the exchange’s reputation is destroyed.

When it comes to NFTs, however, the rules are not so clear. Such tokens may not be securities, so the same laws and regulations governing securities trading may not apply to them.

The background on wash trading laws

Wash trading has been barred in the United States since the passing of the Commodity Exchange Act in 1936 in response to its popularity as a manipulation tool. Since then, however, the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodities Futures Trading Commission have carefully scrutinized markets and brought numerous enforcement actions for “wash traders,” thereby adding a degree of safety to the securities and futures markets.

According to the SEC, “Wash trading is an abusive practice that misleads the market about the genuine supply and demand for a stock.” Meanwhile, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service prohibits taxpayers from deducting losses that result from wash sales, so it is entirely possible that wash trading NFTs could result in an enforcement action. It hinges on how NFTs are classified by regulators.

Traders should examine sales history closely before buying NFTs

Accepting the idea that cryptocurrencies tend to be volatile, along with the slow pace of enforcement actions against new assets like NFTs, it seems natural that many sellers will try to inflate their asset’s value to attract new buyers and earn a profit. NFT buyers should think twice and do their due diligence before making a significant investment into an NFT.

NFT sales to self-financed addresses in 2021. Source: Chainalysis

It may seem like they are getting a valuable asset because of the number or size of transactions in which the investment has been involved, but the truth may be that the asset was only bought and sold between two wallets owned by the same person making the asset appear more in demand that it actually is.

The SEC is probably already preparing to bag its first NFT traders

Even with laws and enforcement actions, we still see wash trading in the regular securities and commodities market, so you can be certain it exists in newer and evolving markets. Hopefully, the SEC is already working on enforcement in the NFT market. Investigations are generally nonpublic, so some traders may already be in regulators’ sights. It’s a safe bet that in the long run, federal regulators will catch up with this new asset class, and wash trading among NFTs will be reined in as well.

Related: Clever NFT traders exploit crypto’s unregulated landscape by wash trading on LooksRare

The SEC should move to protect investors, first by ruling that NFTs will be treated like securities, and then monitoring exchanges for signs of manipulation as they do for other asset classes.

Brendan Cochrane, Esq., CAMS is the blockchain and cryptocurrency partner at YK Law LLP. He is also the principal and founder of CryptoCompli, a startup focused on the compliance needs of cryptocurrency businesses.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.



via cointelgraph.com
Accomplice of 'Cryptoqueen' Ruja Ignatova faces extradition to US: Report

Accomplice of 'Cryptoqueen' Ruja Ignatova faces extradition to US: Report

The British national facing extradition was allegedly involved in laundering $105 million through the crypto Ponzi scheme OneCoin starting in 2014.

Christopher Hamilton, a British national allegedly connected to Cryptoqueen’ Ruja Ignatova’s cryptocurrency scheme OneCoin, reportedly faces extradition to the United States on charges related to a scam going back to 2014.

According to a Tuesday report from legal news outlet Law360, a judge in the United Kingdom will allow the process to move forward for Hamilton to be extradited to the U.S. on charges of wire fraud and money laundering. Hamilton was allegedly involved in laundering $105 million through the crypto Ponzi scheme OneCoin, which defrauded more than 3 million investors of more than $4 billion through the sale of packages starting in 2014.

Under a bilateral extradition agreement between the United States and the United Kingdom signed in 2003, an executive authority of the U.K. government — in this case, likely Home Secretary Priti Patel — will decide whether to proceed with Hamilton’s transfer to U.S. custody. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the extradition process “can take many months or even years to complete.” Hamilton will also likely be able to appeal the decision.

Related: Alexander Vinnik reportedly en route to the US after extradition

Ignatova received a place on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list in June for her alleged involvement in the crypto Ponzi scheme. According to the FBI, the Cryptoqueen's last known location was in Athens in 2017. The bureau offered to pay up to $100,000 for information leading to her arrest. Europol is also offering a 5,000-euro reward for “crucial information" related to Ignatova's whereabouts.

“Ignatova allegedly made false statements and representations about OneCoin to draw people to invest in OneCoin packages,” said the FBI in June. “According to investigators, Ignatova and her partner also promoted OneCoin through a multi-level marketing strategy that urged OneCoin investors to sell additional packages to friends and family.”



via cointelgraph.com
Ethereum to $2K? ETH price 'bull flag' hints at September gains versus Bitcoin, dollar

Ethereum to $2K? ETH price 'bull flag' hints at September gains versus Bitcoin, dollar

Ether is forming classic bullish patterns against the greenback and its top crypto rival on shorter-timeframe charts.

Ethereum's native token, Ether (ETH), looks ready to grow stronger compared to the U.S. dollar and Bitcoin (BTC) in the days leading up to its proof-of-stake transition in September.

ETH price chart bullish setup

The bullish outlook emerges from classic technical indicators on ETH/USD and ETH/BTC charts. For instance, ETH/USD has been forming a "falling wedge" pattern with a profit target sitting around 30% above the current prices. 

Meanwhile, the ETH/BTC chart is painting a potential "bull flag" that could increase the price by approximately 10% from current price levels upon resolution.

Here's how these bullish setups could play out.

Ethereum to $2K next?

Falling wedges form when the price trends lower inside a descending, contracting channel.

Falling wedge illustration. Source: New Trader U

They typically resolve after the price breaks above their upper trendlines. Their breakout target is as high as the maximum distance between their upper and lower trendlines when measured from the breakout point

ETH's price has been decreasing since mid-August in a falling wedge pattern. It recently rebounded after testing the structure's lower trendline to hit the upper trendline and now eyes a breakout toward or above $2,000, as shown below.

ETH/USD daily price chart featuring falling wedge breakout setup. Source: TradingView

The wedge's profit target coincides with Ethereum's 200-day exponential moving average (200-day EMA; the blue wave) at $2,055.

Moreover, the target appears to be a junction as ETH eyes an extended bull run toward $2,500. This level is the upside target of a broader ascending channel (the purple range) that has been forming since June.

In other words, ETH's price could grow anywhere by 30%–55% in September.

ETH/BTC bull flag setup

Bull flags surface when the price consolidates lower inside a descending, parallel channel after a strong upward move.

Bull flag illustration. Source: ThinkMarkets

The pattern resolves after the price breaks above its upper trendline, followed by an extended upside move toward the level at a length equal to the size of the previous uptrend, also called flagpole. As a result, analysts call bull flags "bullish continuation" patterns.

Ether has been forming a bull flag against Bitcoin since early August, awaiting breakout as it tests the structure's upper trendline for one. Suppose it happens, then the price could rise toward 0.087 BTC, up approximately 10% from August 3's price.

ETH/BTC daily price chart featuring bull flag breakout setup. Source: TradingView

Alternatively, ETH/BTC could flip lower to retest the flag's lower trendline. This trendline appears to be coinciding with a support confluence consisting of a 50-day EMA (the red wave) and the 0.618 Fib line at 0.0729 BTC.

Related: Ethereum miner balance reaches four-year high weeks before the Merge

The pullback will not invalidate the bull flag breakout setup unless the price breaks below the lower trendline. But if it does, ETH/BTC risks falling toward $0.088 BTC, a level synchronous with the 0.5 Fib line and the 200-day EMA (the blue wave).

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph.com. Every investment and trading move involves risk, you should conduct your own research when making a decision.



via cointelgraph.com
Luxury Watchmaker Jacob & Co. Releases Limited-Edition Bitcoin Watch

Luxury Watchmaker Jacob & Co. Releases Limited-Edition Bitcoin Watch

Jacob & Co. put 444 components on two rotating platforms housing many callbacks to the Bitcoin ecosystem for a limited-edition collection of 25 pieces.

Jacob & Co., a luxury U.S.-based watchmaker, has released the Astronomia Solar Bitcoin, a luxury watch based on bitcoin, per the company’s announcement.

The luxury watch, keeping with the economic principles of scarcity associated with bitcoin, is a limited-edition run of 25 pieces.

The clock face rotates on a flying tourbillon which is a 224-year-old mechanism using an open, black, titanium cage which nestles in multiple components paying homage to the Bitcoin ecosystem. The tourbillon rotates in 10-minute intervals.

The clock dial resembles the motherboard typically found in application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), the machines used to mine bitcoin. Additionally, the hands of the clock are plated with 18K rose gold.

Furthermore, the watch houses a Bitcoin logo, a yellow sapphire sun, a one-carat diamond-shaped moon, and a golden earth symbolizing hyperbitcoinization. In addition, there is a miniature rocketship painted black pointing towards the moon and the Bitcoin sign.

All of these symbols rotate atop the main plate which is designed after a microchip which rotates counterclockwise under a single-piece sapphire crystal window, allowing for a transparent, (or “open-source”) viewing of the components.

In total, the Astronomia Solar Bitcoin luxury watch has embedded 444 components atop two rotating platforms for a unique display.

“All these symbols tell the story of the advent of the first cryptocurrency, from abstraction to reality, from outlier to a mainstay of the financial system,” reads the company’s announcement.

Jacob & Co. joins other luxury watchmaker brands in the Bitcoin ecosystem such as Hublot, Breitling, and Tag Heuer. However, Jacob & Co. is, so far, the only one to make a Bitcoin inspired watch as the other watchmakers have so far made the decision to only accept bitcoin as payment.

Luxury brands outside of watchmakers have also begun accepting bitcoin as payment such as Gucci, Balenciaga, and Farfetch, along with a host of smaller luxury retailers. 


via bitcoinmagazine.com

Tether responds to Wall Street Journal ‘disinformation’

To attack Tether’s reserves [...] further highlights an agenda by the publication to single out Tether and hurt its reputation,” the USDT issuer said.

Tether Holdings Limited has clapped back at The Wall Street Journal over an article it claims spread “false information” about the stablecoin issuer’s profitability, solvency and accounting standards. 

In a Monday article, the Journal claimed that Tether could be deemed “technically insolvent” if its assets fell just 0.3%. That conclusion was drawn from Tether’s reported assets and liabilities as of Thursday. One week prior, Tether published its latest attestation showing $67.7 billion of reported assets against $67.5 billion of liabilities.

The August attestation was conducted by BDO Italia, the Italian arm of international accounting firm BDO Global. As Cointelegraph reported, Tether hired BDO Italia to increase the legitimacy and transparency of its attestations. In the process, the stablecoin issuer upped the frequency of its reporting from quarterly to monthly.

“The article seeks to discredit the work that Tether has put into transparent and honest communication to the public,” Tether said in a Tuesday blog post. “BDO, a very reputable and independent Top 5 audit firm, is not a “Tether accounting firm,” as erroneously written by the WSJ.”

In the blog post, Tether refuted the Journal’s claims that its exposure to short-term U.S. Treasury bills is an unsafe strategy. Tether also clapped back at assumptions that its business is unprofitable:

“According to our Consolidated Reserves Report, Tether has never disclosed any equity despite being profitable for several years. This same report has been deemed appropriate by important stakeholders and it has been accepted by the NYAG. Perhaps the WSJ has confused Tether with some of its competitors.”

Related: Tether fortifies its reserves: Will it silence critics, mollify investors?

As the crypto market’s oldest and largest stablecoin issuer, Tether is no stranger to criticism. Detractors hav long claimed that Tether’s USDT stablecoin is not adequately backed by reserves. Others have criticized the company’s use of commercial paper as backing. On June 27, The Wall Street Journal reported that short sellers have been “ramping up their bets against Tether” after the collapse of the Terra (Luna) — now renamed Terra Classic (LUNC) — ecosystem.



via cointelgraph.com
Fiat Infects Relationships With Low Time-Preference

Fiat Infects Relationships With Low Time-Preference

Relationships are another victim of the low time-preference infection created by fiat money.

This is an opinion editorial by Jimmy Song, a Bitcoin developer, educator and entrepreneur and programmer with over 20 years of experience.

Our relationships have an unwelcome intruder, and that's the government.

A society is a network of relationships between people. An edge should be bilateral and relationships should be direct, but unfortunately, in today's fiat world, they are not. Most relationships have an authority in the middle and thus have a centralized controller. That's not necessarily a bad thing. When it comes to justice or common standards, a third party that can figure something out in the midst of conflict is desirable. Centralization is a problem when it restricts the freedom of how people want to relate, especially when there's no conflict.

I don't need to argue here the importance of human relationships for a good and happy life. That is a given and everyone knows this instinctively. Even people who are very good at sustaining themselves need relationships as can be seen in the popular TV show “Alone.” Doing without human relationships is simply not a pleasant experience. No matter how introverted you may claim to be, you still have at least a few relationships that matter. Relationships are, in many ways, the thing that makes life interesting and worth living. The relationship network is civilization.

Unfortunately, our relationships, the edges on the network of civilization, have been debased. The unwelcome intrusion by authorities making bilateral relationships have created bureaucracy and added trusted third parties. I've written about this with respect to a specific relationship, that of marriage, but this applies to many other relationships. The quality of all relationships has been made much worse by the presence of fiat money.

We all instinctively feel this. Relationships seem especially shallow and there's a high time-preference feel to them. Why do first impressions matter so much more these days? Why is it so difficult to connect with anyone at a deep level? Is life imitating Facebook where we know all sorts of surface-level details about people but little of the depth of their character? Do most people even have a desire to have deep relationships? There's clearly something askew about relationships and this essay is an exploration into why.

High Time-Preference Relationships

One of the most obvious consequences of fiat money is that it incentivizes high time-preference behavior. Why save and plan for the future when the very money that we use is debased constantly? Government promises various forms of safety nets for the long term, so why not live for the present? Fiat money changes the incentives from long-term planning to short-term fun.

As a result, relationships are not built with the view of a long time-horizon. Working relationships, friendships and even family relations are entered into with a very short-term focus. In a fiat economy, people expect relationships to provide for the here and now. It's no wonder, then, that global birth rates are going down everywhere. If you think about it, the parent-child relationship is a very long-term investment. 20-30 years is a long time to wait and in a fiat economy, such waiting just doesn't make much sense.

Sadly, a short-term focus incentivizes exploitation. If you're not in a relationship for the long term, why not burn bridges for your own benefit?

Further, the short-term nature of relationships makes them shallow. People are more concerned with having fun or getting access or making life convenient than with character, loyalty or reliability. High time-preference relationships are more volatile and require a lot more maintenance. Your relationship is only as good as your last interaction and if it wasn't fun or interesting or feel-good in some way, it's likely to end. Say some harsh truth and you're likely to no longer have a relationship, for example.

In a fiat system, people have a higher time-preference and high time-preference people are not very disciplined. This naturally means that they are liable to act more emotionally and without much regard to the long term. Many people end up burning relationships on a regular basis because the investment in that relationship wasn't much to begin with. This is especially true of people who don't need anything from you. Many of these people are rent-seekers and they're one of the blights to relationships in today's society.

Fiat Reduces The Need For Reputation

Reputation used to be critical to making money. Being a good baker, cobbler or lawyer meant that you did a good job and treated your customers well. Having a bad reputation was a quick path to ruin.

Fiat money changed that.

Rent-seeking opportunities abound in a fiat money system and those require little to no reputation. Instead of being subject to market forces of supply and demand, rent-seekers need to only please the money printer. The only relationship that needs to be maintained is with whoever pays the salary. Of course, the payor of the salary usually has certain requirements and standards, but fulfilling requirements requires monitoring. The payor of the salary becomes the trusted third party in the bilateral relationship. Rent seekers will do the minimum they can to meet requirements. The third party's presence and evaluation debases the relationship.

Contrast this with a market transaction. People that are seeking your business or service are much more likely to self-monitor and invest in the relationship. They have a much longer time-horizon because they are motivated by profit, not by satisfying a boss.

Fiat jobs have essentially made long-term consumer relationships almost unnecessary. Fiat has permeated other relationships and like most fiat things, has infected and debased them like cancer.

Implied Third Party

The most obvious fiat infection is in employer-employee relationships. The government regulates the relationship through employment laws. Salaries are taxed, certain benefits are required and both sides have to fulfill requirements of the government mandates. The government is a third party in the relationship and they add a lot of friction.

Monetarily, it's a tax on the relationship, but the debasement is also in its depth. Instead of employers and employees creatively figuring out what would work for them, the government decides how the relationship has to be. Thus, much of the employer-employee relationships are standardized. There's little innovation or competition because these aspects are the same everywhere.

This is why companies feel so cold and impersonal. Fiat companies are essentially extensions of government and they become rent-seeking which make them less focused on the long term. How many employees feel loyalty to a company anymore? It's now expected that people leave a company and come back to get a promotion. Everyone is acting in high time-preference in that scenario as it costs both the company and the employee lots of money, time and energy that a good relationship would fix.

Even entrepreneurs are not exempt from government intervention as their relationships with their customers are regulated. The regulations are ostensibly for the purposes of protecting one of the parties, but end up keeping out innovation and creativity. If you wonder why some industries, like airlines, haven't progressed, it's because of these regulations and unfortunately that's most of the economy now.

Politics Overtakes Everything

Relationships that have money at the center, like employer-employee and producer-consumer relationships are not the only relationships affected by fiat money. Because politics overtakes everything in a fiat-money economy, politics makes its unwelcome entry into even personal relationships.

The prize of getting to print money is such a big incentive that everyone fights over the right to do it for their own group's benefit. Rent-seeking is a lot easier than serving the needs of the market, so political action takes on an enormous importance. Politics is by nature zero-sum, meaning that getting political benefits requires someone to lose. Thus, advancing the needs of your group is naturally going to conflict with the needs of another group.

The political arguments also become morally charged. Every argument for money ends up being a moral argument. There's a huge incentive to claim victimhood so that the moral argument for money becomes more viable. The bigger your victim status, the bigger moral claim to newly printed money you have.

Relationships are now tinged with that victimhood status and ultimately, become monetary. The balance of payment in victimhood becomes a monetary payment through fiat money. Thus, your relationship with people in another political group has an implied third party in fiat money.

People within your group create an echo-chamber quality in it, where saying something politically in opposition to that group is liable to get you ostracized. After all, you're costing them money! Fiat money reduces our relationships to the surface-level support of political ends. They feel shallow because they are.

Status Games

The political and rent-seeking nature of relationships means that status takes on a huge importance. You cannot make money in a fiat economy without climbing the status ladder. Unlike a market economy where innovation, creativity and useful goods and services make you money, in a fiat economy, having the right opinions, having the right political skills and having the ability to make a good first impression are what get you in with the money printer.

This is reflected in the relationships we have. People are seeking your vote or support within your in-group so they can climb the status ladder. Organizations become larger versions of middle school with all the backstabbing, gossiping and shallowness. Even worse, relationships get dropped the minute they are no longer politically expedient. Thus, they tend to not last very long.

Contrast this to market economies, where the goods and services matter much more. The goods and services ultimately make the impression, not the political abilities of the person selling them. Further, market transactions tend to be much longer-term. Switching costs are real and people tend to want higher quality over time. Relationships in a market economy cannot afford to be fly-by-night. You can't just burn bridges without it costing you money.

Friendship

Sadly this political game is all too common in friend groups and makes them have a much higher time-preference. Status within the group is more important than any bilateral relationship due to the group's political nature and that means people come and go in a friend group way more often. After all, who wants to be at the bottom of a status hierarchy when they can try their luck elsewhere?

One of the sad things I've seen over the years is the proliferation of MLM-type schemes on Facebook where people sell goods to their friends for some kickback. People are seeing friendships as a resource to make money and are perfectly happy to exploit them for that purpose. Such behavior debases the relationship as it forces money into the equation and most people are too polite to call such people out. The result is a lot of burned bridges and relationships that shatter because of the attempt at rent-seeking.

Authority-Subject Relationships

The oddity of democracy is that, at least nominally, the authorities need the consent of the governed. Consent of the governed is a good thing. But unfortunately, when fiat money enters the equation, we get deceitful governance.

We are now constantly being propagandized to believe that everything is going swell — or at least that the authorities are doing a good job — when in fact, they are not. The incentives for authorities are to get our vote because the prize of newly printed money is so huge. If they can get our vote through deception, rhetoric and propaganda even while isolating 49% of the population, they will. The truth is not fun to swallow, so the incentive is to lie and deceive. That's not a great foundation for a relationship. The cynicism, skepticism and outright hostility toward the political system reflects this.

Bitcoin Fixes This

One of the remarkable things about my journey in Bitcoin has been the quality of relationships I've had the pleasure of developing. There are a lot of good and interesting people in this space and I'm fortunate to be friends with many of them.

The incentives of Bitcoin are very different from fiat money. What I've seen is that the high time-preference people will show themselves. Indeed, many people recently have burned bridges by condemning Bitcoin Maximalists and their harsh truths. I see these people as still being under fiat influence. The people that have stayed, though, are many and they are not liable to go away easily because there's simply more character and loyalty in this group.

Bitcoin is different and changes the incentives in relationships. We care more deeply about the long term because we have savings and can plan for that. Relationships matter and weeding out the bad ones is just as important as keeping the good ones. Bitcoiners instinctively know this from the many affinity-scamming altcoiners in our space. The relationships that last are self-selecting. It's a beautiful system of how relationships ought to be.

Let's make relationships deep again.


Ten Reasons You're Lonely

  1. Meeting your MMORPG friends in real life just wasn't as interesting as you thought it'd be.
  2. Zoom calls sadly don't satisfy your need for warm human contact.
  3. You think changing your Tinder profile is improving yourself.
  4. You insist on watching part 15 of an anime series when people come over.
  5. Eating take-out at the office to make partner status has been a bigger priority than dates.
  6. You keep telling your life story to anyone that shows even minimal listening skills.
  7. You only meet people at political rallies.
  8. You insist on having only friends that envy your success.
  9. It's hard to bring dates over to your parents' basement.
  10. You're not happy unless you're miserable.

This is a guest post by Jimmy Song. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Crypto.com accidentally transfered $10.5M to client instead of $100 refund

Crypto.com accidentally transfered $10.5M to client instead of $100 refund

Court documents allege that the recipient used a portion of the funds to purchase a luxury mansion upon receipt.

According to local news outlet 7News, two Melbourne women, Manivel Thevamanogari and her sister Gangadory Thevamanogari, received an AUD$10.5 million deposit from Singaporean crypto exchange Crypto.com after the latter made an error in issuing an AUD$100 refund. Instead of the refund amount, an employee allegedly typed an account number in the payment section, resulting in an erroneous transfer to their bank account. 

The incident occurred back in May 2021, but was not discovered until an annual audit in December 2021. After filing a lawsuit, the Victoria Supreme Court recently ruled that the funds must be returned to the company. However, it turns out that Manivel has already spent AUD$1.35 million worth of the funds on a five-bedroom luxury home in Craigieburn. She was ordered to sell the property and return the remaining funds or face potential contempt of court charges. The case will return to court in October.

Regarding the case, Justin Lawrence from Henderson and Ball Lawyers said:

"There's no doubt that if you saw that in your account, you would know it shouldn't be there, and the onus is actually on you to call the sender and say, look, that shouldn't have come into my account."

Unlike crypto transactions, which are final and irreversible, it is possible for centralized financial institutions to reverse erroneous transactions. However, given the time it took to discover the error and that the funds from Crypto.com were transferred out of the original account post-receipt, a simple transaction reversal would have been impossible in this instance. 



via cointelgraph.com
Price analysis 8/29: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, SHIB, MATIC

Price analysis 8/29: BTC, ETH, BNB, XRP, ADA, SOL, DOGE, DOT, SHIB, MATIC

Bitcoin bulls are fighting to hold the $20,000 level and several altcoins have seized upon the range-bound trading by rallying up to 10%.

The United States equities markets are attempting to stabilize after the carnage on Aug. 26. On similar lines, Bitcoin (BTC) is also witnessing a see-saw battle near the psychological level of $20,000 with both the bulls and the bears vying for supremacy. 

Although several analysts are bearish on Bitcoin in the near term, it has not stopped the whales from accumulating at lower levels. Data from on-chain research firm Santiment shows that the number of whale addresses holding between 100 to 10,000 Bitcoin has risen by 103 in the past 30 days.

Daily cryptocurrency market performance. Source: Coin360

In bear markets, rumors spread fast and could result in quick declines, but many times, the fears are unfounded. Mt. Gox creditors confirmed on Twitter that the rumor of a 137,000 Bitcoin dump spread on social media was false. The creditors said that the infrastructure needed to start the repayment was still notin place.

Could Bitcoin and major altcoins sustain the rebound? Let’s study the charts of the top-10 cryptocurrencies to find out.

BTC/USDT

Bitcoin closed below the psychological level of $20,000 on Aug. 28 but the bears could not build upon their advantage. Buyers have pushed the price back above $20,000 on Aug. 29, which shows strong demand at lower levels.

BTC/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The BTC/USDT pair could rise to the 20-day exponential moving average (EMA) ($21,620), which is an important level to keep an eye on. If bulls push the price above this resistance, it could signal that the bearish momentum is weakening. A break and close above the moving averages could open the doors for a possible rally to $25,211.

Alternatively, if the price turns down from the downtrend line or the moving averages, it will suggest that bears are selling on every minor rise. The pair could then decline to the strong support zone of $18,910 to $18,626. The bulls are expected to defend this zone with all their might because if the support cracks, the pair could drop to the June low at $17,622.

ETH/USDT

Ether (ETH) turned down from the 20-day EMA ($1,638) on Aug. 26 and broke below the neckline of the head and shoulders pattern. This completed the bearish setup, indicating that the sellers are in control.

ETH/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

However, the bears could not sustain the price below the neckline, indicating buying on dips. The bulls are attempting to push and sustain the price above the neckline and challenge the overhead resistance at $1,700. If they succeed, the ETH/USDT pair could rally to the psychological level of $2,000.

Conversely, if the price turns down from the current level or the moving averages, it will suggest that bears are active at higher levels. If the price turns down and breaks below the neckline, the pair could drop to the strong support at $1,280. The bulls are expected to defend this level aggressively but if they fail to do that, the pair could plunge to $1,050.

BNB/USDT

The failure of the bulls to sustain the price above the 20-day EMA ($293) on Aug. 25 attracted heavy selling. BNB turned down sharply on Aug. 26 and broke below the 50-day simple moving average (SMA) ($284).

BNB/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

A minor positive is that the bulls did not allow the price to sustain below the strong support at $275. The buyers are attempting to push the price above the 50-day SMA.

If they succeed, the BNB/USDT pair could rally to the 20-day EMA where the bears may pose a strong challenge. The bulls will have to push the pair above $308 to open the doors for a possible rally to $338.

Conversely, if the price turns down from the moving average and breaks below $275, it will complete a head and shoulders pattern. This negative setup could start a decline to $240 and then to the target objective at $212.

XRP/USDT

The bulls failed to sustain Ripple (XRP) above the moving averages on Aug. 26, indicating that the breakout may have been a bull trap. That intensified selling and the bears are attempting to pull the price to the strong support at $0.30.

XRP/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

Buyers are likely to defend the $0.30 support aggressively because if the support cracks, the XRP/USDT pair could start the next leg of the downtrend. The pair could then decline to $0.25 and later to the pattern target of $0.21.

Alternatively, if the price rebounds off $0.30 with strength, it will indicate strong demand at lower levels. The bulls will then again attempt to push the price above the moving averages. If they can pull it off, the pair could rally to the strong overhead resistance at $0.39.

ADA/USDT

Cardano (ADA) continues to gradually slide toward strong support at $0.40. The bulls have bought the dips to this level on two previous occasions; hence, it may again attract buyers.

ADA/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The bulls are attempting to push the price above the moving averages. If they succeed, the ADA/USDT pair could rally to the downtrend line and later attempt an up-move to the $0.70 to $0.74 resistance zone.

On the other hand, if the price once again turns down from the moving averages, it will suggest a lack of demand at higher levels. The bears will then try to sink the price below $0.40 and resume the downtrend.

SOL/USDT

Solana (SOL) broke and closed below the strong support at $32 on Aug. 26, indicating that the range has broken down in favor of the bears.

SOL/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The bulls are attempting to push the price back above the breakdown level of $32. If they succeed, the SOL/USDT pair could rise to the 20-day EMA ($36). This is an important level to keep an eye on because a break and close above it could increase the possibility of the pair remaining inside the $32 to $48 range for a few more days.

Conversely, if the price turns down from the current level or the 20-day EMA, it will suggest that bears are in control. The pair could then decline to the vital support at $26. A break and close below this level could indicate the start of the next leg of the downtrend.

DOGE/USDT

Dogecoin (DOGE) broke and closed below the trendline of the ascending triangle pattern on Aug. 26, which invalidated the bullish setup. The price has dropped to the immediate support at $0.06.

DOGE/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

If the price rebounds off the current level, it will suggest that bulls may be accumulating on dips. The buyers will then again try to push the price above the moving averages. If they manage to do that, the DOGE/USDT pair could rally to $0.08. A break and close above this level will be the first sign that the bears may be losing their grip.

Alternatively, if the price breaks below $0.06, the selling could intensify and the pair could drop to the critical support at $0.05. The bulls are likely to defend this support with all their might because if the level cracks, the pair could resume its downtrend.

Related: These 3 altcoins have completely ignored the bear market in the last 90 days

DOT/USDT

Polkadot (DOT) remains stuck inside the large range between $10 and $6. The downsloping 20-day EMA ($7.68) and the RSI in the negative territory indicate an advantage to bears.

DOT/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The bulls are attempting to push the price above the moving averages. If they manage to do that, the DOT/USDT pair could rally toward $9.17 and then to the overhead resistance at $10.

On the contrary, if the price once again turns down from the moving averages, it will suggest that bears are selling on rallies. The pair could then decline to the crucial support at $6. The bears will have to sink and sustain the price below this level to suggest the start of the next leg of the downtrend.

SHIB/USDT

Shiba Inu (SHIB) broke and closed below the immediate support at $0.000012 on Aug. 28 but the bears could not build upon the advantage. This suggests that bulls are buying on dips.

SHIB/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

If buyers sustain the price above the 50-day SMA ($0.000012), the SHIB/USDT pair could attempt a rally to the overhead resistance at $0.000014. If the price turns down from this level, the SHIB/USDT pair could remain stuck between $0.000012 and $0.000014 for some time.

If bulls thrust and sustain the price above $0.000014, the pair could rally to the stiff resistance of $0.000018. This bullish view will invalidate in the near term if the price turns down and plummets below the Aug. 28 intraday low.

MATIC/USDT

Polygon’s (MATIC) rebound met with stiff resistance at the 20-day EMA ($0.83) on Aug. 28, indicating that bears are defending the level aggressively.

MATIC/USDT daily chart. Source: TradingView

The MATIC/USDT pair bounced off the strong support at $0.75 on Aug. 29, indicating that the bulls are buying the dips to the support of the range. The pair is stuck between the 20-day EMA and $0.75 but this tight-range trading is unlikely to continue for long.

If buyers drive the price above the moving averages, the pair could rally to the overhead resistance at $1.05 where the bears may again pose a strong challenge. Alternatively, if the price plummets below $0.75, the pair could decline to the strong support at $0.63.

The views and opinions expressed here are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cointelegraph. Every investment and trading move involves risk. You should conduct your own research when making a decision.

Market data is provided by HitBTC exchange.



via cointelgraph.com

Student Loan Forgiveness Makes The Case For Bitcoin

Biden’s student loan forgiveness plan demonstrates the need for sovereign financial rails like Bitcoin.

This is a transcribed excerpt of the “Bitcoin Magazine Podcast,” hosted by P and Q. In this episode, Q is joined by Jimmy Song, author of several Bitcoin books, to discuss the problems with President Biden's student loan forgiveness plan.

Watch This Episode On YouTube or Rumble

Listen To The Episode Here:

Q: Given the recent news and the announcement of the federal student loan program and Biden's plans [to forgive student loans], I wanna unpack it a little bit with you…

You have these student loans that in certain situations where it's far too much, students can't even declare bankruptcy on them. Like the loans themselves weren't designed well enough to allow for the market to correct itself. I don't think this is a solution. This isn't even a bandaid. In my opinion, the root issue is not solved…

I’m just curious, in your opinion, where do we go from here?

Jimmy Song: It’s no different than the $600 stimmy checks that we got. It’s just targeted at different people. And quite frankly, at people that made poor economic decisions in attending college, a lot of the people that have these student loans, they didn't even finish. Like, those are not necessarily people you're gonna wanna bail out. They made pretty bad decisions, that's his way of buying votes.

I have lots of qualms from, like, a constitutional standpoint. How is it that the president can do this unilaterally without Congress? And how is it that he's able to forgive loans that he didn't make?

…He wasn’t even in office or whatever, and wasn’t done by him. It was a federal student loan program that was issue by banks. There are all sorts of weird stuff around this, but it really isn’t anything more than a stimulus. It’s just, you know, printing more money and removing it from the balance sheet of individuals who have student loan debt and putting it on the federal balance sheet…

This is straight vote buying to me and, call me cynical, but this is what my last article was about: fiat politics suck. And this is part of the consequences of that. If you’re not part of this group, then you’re getting screwed. And it’s not going to be obvious, but you’re going to be paying more money somewhere, at the grocery store.

And if you paid back your loans you’re even more screwed because you could have had free money but you don’t qualify now.


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Meta announces Facebook and Instagram users can post NFTs from digital wallets

Meta announces Facebook and Instagram users can post NFTs from digital wallets

“This will enable people to connect their digital wallets once to either app in order to share their digital collectibles across both,” said Meta.

Facebook and Instagram users can both post nonfungible tokens, or NFTs, and digital collectibles to their accounts by linking their wallets.

In a Monday update to a May 10 blog post, Facebook’s parent company Meta said the social media platform’s roughly 2.9 billion users would have the ability to share digital collectibles and NFTs. The announcement followed an Aug. 4 update in which Meta said Instagram users across 100 countries could post digital collectibles minted on the Flow blockchain or from wallets supporting the Ethereum or Polygon blockchains to their accounts, estimated to be between 1 billion and 2 billion users as of the second quarter of 2022.

Source: Meta

“As we continue rolling out digital collectibles on Facebook and Instagram, we’ve started giving people the ability to post digital collectibles that they own across both Facebook and Instagram,” said Meta. “This will enable people to connect their digital wallets once to either app in order to share their digital collectibles across both.”

Connecting digital wallets to either Facebook or Instagram seems to be limited to the apps rather than through third-party browsers. However, expanding the reach of NFTs into each and every smartphone with one of Meta’s apps installed could result in additional earnings or adoption for the social media giant. In May, Meta also filed applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for its namesake to be used in a crypto payments platform called Meta Pay.

Related: FTC files lawsuit against Meta over attempted monopolization of metaverse

Though Meta abandoned launching its own stablecoin in February after facing pushback from regulators globally, CEO Mark Zuckerberg said there was a “massive opportunity” to make up to trillions of dollars in the digital asset space as it grows. The company reported a 1% drop in revenue year over year in the second quarter of 2022.



via cointelgraph.com
Surfing Bitcoin Maximalism

Surfing Bitcoin Maximalism

For three days, thousands of Bitcoiners convened in the French coastal city of Biarritz to dive deep on Bitcoin, network, and promote Bitcoin maximalism.

Surfin’ Bitcoin Conference, Casino Barrière Biarritz, France.

Josselin Tonnellier

Josselin Tonnellier organized the first Surfin’ Bitcoin Conference to educate people about Bitcoin and his French startup StackinSat, through which Europeans can accumulate Bitcoin via dollar cost averaging.

“Bitcoin is quite niche in France. We have a lot of blockchain and shitcoining,” Tonnellier remarked.

There aren’t many Bitcoin-only businesses in France. It’s remarkable that a team of about five people was able to coordinate and fund a conference of Surfin’ Bitcoin’s size, with just ten sponsors, notably among them Bpifrance, an investment bank for entrepreneurs.

According to Tonnellier, more than half of this year’s conference attendees were professional Bitcoiners. Nearly 25% were Bitcoin enthusiasts and OGs, and about 25% of them were general crypto enthusiasts.

Tonnellier originally brought Surfin’ Bitcoin to the South of France to decentralize the event away from Paris. Over the past few years, Surfin’ Bitcoin has grown from a few hundred attendees to about 2,000.

There were just over one hundred speakers at the conference. About 35% of them came from abroad, mostly European countries. For the first time the event included English content, with around 45 scheduled English speakers, and around 50 who spoke in French.

The first day of the conference was free, drawing in early conference attendees and tourists from the beach, some of whom experienced their first touch-point with Bitcoin, together viewing the French documentary Le Mystère Satoshi, by Remi Forte.

The conference hosted several debates—for example, Austrian economics vs Keynesian economics and crypto venture capitalists vs Bitcoin venture capitalists—in an attempt to stir up controversy, but also to win over crypto curious attendees with the Bitcoin maximalist point of view.

The main stage French presentations were packed throughout the conference, and what many of the English panels and workshops lacked in attendance they gained in interactivity between the audience and the speakers.

One Norwegian speaker even opted to come into the audience to do impromptu small group discussion of how best to defend Bitcoin mining from the often disingenuous environmental, social and governance (ESG) arguments against it.

The strength of Bitcoiners is that they are motivated whatever the situation, and that’s a strength altcoiners don’t have, Tonnellier noted.

“If the price is going up, I’m happy. If the price is going down, I’m happy because I accumulate more Bitcoin on the cheap. My clients understand that at StackingSat,” he said.

Tonnellier mentioned the recent failures of LUNA and Celsius, commenting that “we’re very sad by all the people that were wrecked by it, but it’s a way to clean the ecosystem of the actors who are not doing business in a proper way.”

He continued, “All the lending and defi stuff is quite dangerous, and can collapse very easily.”

Meanwhile, Bitcoin is thriving. “Bitcoin has faced many adversities throughout its life, and each time it comes out stronger,” he said.

The media in France hasn’t been too positive about Bitcoin, and Tonnellier noted the regulatory hurdles of launching both StackingSat and the conference. He hoped the conference itself will provide a positive Bitcoin touchpoint for the local Basque community.

The main downside to the Surfin’ Bitcoin conference was also its greatest virtue, the location.

The casino is beautiful. Light floods in from the two-story windows overlooking an expansive, sunny promenade, La Grande Plage. The busy beach is buffered by cliffs, swarms of swimmers in the rolling Atlantic and pods of surfers in the morning and late afternoon.

The allure of Basque country is so strong that many foreign attendees remarked on how hard it was to sit through full days worth of Bitcoin programming. 

To the Southwest, attendees could see the mountains and lights of Spain. To the Northeast, the lighthouse on the cliffs and the luxurious Hôtel du Palais, a former imperial vacation villa built for Napoleon III.

Up and down the coast as far as one can see, an eclectic mix of architecture winds through the 12th century whaling port, with its endless roughcast villas, the gray stone of Bidache, the red stone of the Rhune, lining Biarritz’s alleys, bridges and staircases climbing the hills.

When walking between stages, down the exhibition hall, or taking lunch on the expansive casino roof, dotted with French conference attendees smoking cigarettes and chatting, you could see hundreds of people lying in the sun, up and down the coast, dozens tumbling in the waves.

Tonnellier’s goal was to educate people on Bitcoin in a relaxed environment by the beach, rather than host a “bowtie conference in Paris.”

Indeed, on the rooftop of Casino Barrière Biarritz, just a stone’s throw from the beach, over 1,000 Bitcoiners gathered at sunset, casually eating, drinking and networking.

Some danced as the DJ played on the closing night of the conference, most clustered in groups, chattering about Bitcoin and legacy finance until 4:00 a.m., when many then returned to their beachside hotels, or then parted to go clubbing together.

There seemed to be little small talk among enthusiastic Bitcoiners in Biarritz, many of whom have aligned philosophies, principles and lucid hyperbitcoinized visions for the world’s financial future.

Pierre Rochard

Pierre Rochard, VP of research at Riot Blockchain, moved away from France at a young age. He opted to speak in English at this year’s Surfing’ Bitcoin Conference.

Pierre attended his first Bitcoin conference in New York in 2013, where he met Suhas Daftuar. The connection later led to a Bitcoin job at Chaincode Labs.

At the time, during the 2012–2013 Cypriot financial crisis, Pierre recalls the sentiment among Bitcoiners on Reddit was that the bank run in Cyprus would trigger mass Bitcoin adoption.

The belief among Bitcoiners draws parallels to this day, where the network’s adoption is often assumed to be inversely proportional to the unethical behavior of central banks, and global state theft via inflation and taxes.

“You can’t really just foist Bitcoin onto the general public, and expect them to be interested,” Pierre remarked.

He went on to explain that the general public views Bitcoin as just a brand among crypto brands, in part due to the misleading advertising of the large crypto exchanges.

“Bitcoin’s node software is strictly superior to Dogecoin’s node software, for example, and the brand is just very far downstream from that fact,” he added.

Pierre recalls losing interest in Bitcoin during the 2014-2015 bear market. “I certainly didn’t rage quit or lose confidence in Bitcoin. I started focusing on building my own quadcopter drone instead.”

In 2015, when the price of Bitcoin was around $300 dollars, Pierre recalled a tongue-in-cheek conversation with Michael Goldstein. “We should just keep the Nakamoto Institute website up, even if Bitcoin doesn’t become a thing, as a historical artifact.”

Today, Pierre’s wife Morgen Rochard runs a financial planning practice, where she has succeeded in helping 90% of her clients get exposure to Bitcoin. “Most of them also hold their own private keys,” she said.

Pierre sees the perfect audience for Bitcoin conferences as the curious-to-casual Bitcoiners who are looking to further educate themselves.

In 2018 Pierre attended Consensus, where, at a satellite event put on by The Block, he was invited to speak on Bitcoin maximalism. At that event he met the team of his current employer, Riot Blockchain.

Pierre considers the challenge of conferences to be striking a content balance between pop-culture Bitcoin and open-source Bitcoin audiences.

An engaging balance was struck in Biarritz, with entire stages dedicated to expert-level Bitcoin content and technical workshops, and several controversial debates between professional Bitcoiners and altcoiners.

Prince Philip Karageorgevitch of Serbia

Prince Philip Karageorgevitch first encountered Bitcoin in the run up to $100 dollars in 2013. He first bought bitcoin in 2017 and held it through the bear market, buying regularly.

The prince began to learn more about Bitcoin in response to global government overreach during the covid pandemic. “That’s when I realized there’s something not right with this world.”

“I’m a Bitcoin maxi,” he stated. “Eventually I will probably be working in Bitcoin.”

At the conference Prince Philip delivered a keynote on why he is bullish on Bitcoin and also moderated a panel on the future perspective of Bitcoin and crypto markets.

He believes the benefit of Bitcoin conferences is that the crypto curious might educate themselves and become maximalists.

“Altcoiners also know there’s something wrong with the world, but they don’t know what it is really. They understand that money corrupts, but they don’t understand their money is corrupt,” he said.

Prince Philip explained how Bitcoin is the only ethical alternative to the fiat system, a maximalist position with which many crypto enthusiasts don’t agree.

“People aren’t taught about what money is really. They don’t understand how the wars of history are funded,” he said.

Indeed, many of those who neglect Bitcoin as a form of self-sovereign savings have left the market, and it remains to be seen how far below $20,000 bitcoin speculators, whales and noobs will send the price.

The common strategy among the French conference goers was to just buy and hodl Bitcoin, though many also spoke of small allocation, speculative derivative plays. Despite the bear market, there is no shortage of Bitcoin conferences in the coming months.

“This bear market is great because it sorts out those who really care about Bitcoin from those who are just here for fiat gains.”

Prince Philip commented that the crypto sponsorships and speaker slots that often accompany Bitcoin conferences are a good opportunity to educate people on Bitcoin maximalism.

“Right now nation states are considering Bitcoin,” he argued. “They have to because it’s a threat. If it’s a threat they have to have an insurance hedge against Bitcoin. The only insurance hedge against Bitcoin is to buy Bitcoin.”

The IMF and World Bank won’t admit it, but tourism increases in countries and cities that are friendly to Bitcoin. The greatest example of this is El Salvador, where tourism increased 82.8% in the first half of 2022, in part due to the influx of thousands of visiting Bitcoiners.

This is evident at Biarritz as well, where over the course of three days, thousands of Bitcoiners descended on the sunny Basque city, packing its hotels, beaches, clubs, tapas bars and restaurants.

Prince Philip remarked that in Serbia, however, the populace mistrusts governments, and is skeptical of outside powers, viewing Bitcoin as too good to be true. The country has gone through multiple wars in the past 90 years, experiencing the third highest hyperinflation in the world during the 1990’s.

Prince Philip concluded that with education, Serbians will understand how Bitcoin adoption empowers them to take control of their own money.

Charles Guillemet

Charles Guillemet, CTO at French cryptocurrency hardware wallet company Ledger, has a background in cryptography and security. He joined the firm in 2017.

According to Guillemet, Ledger currently has over 800 employees and is the largest crypto hardware wallet provider on the planet.

When I asked Guillemet whether he was a Bitcoiner, he hesitated. “Definitely I think Bitcoin is king. It has a unique value proposition in the ecosystem.”

Guillemet believes Ethereum also has a unique value proposition, “which can be respected as well.”

“With Ethereum there are plenty of technical challenges, and maybe a more efficient blockchain could take its place,” he conceded.

We agreed that Guillemet is a Bitcoiner, but not a Bitcoin maximalist.

I asked Guillemet whether he preferred Bitcoin or crypto conferences. He replied, “At Ledger we don’t have a religion. We are providing security tools for users to get onboarded. We have different trends.”

“What’s important for us is the seriousness of the project,” Guillemet said. I asked him how he qualified that. “It’s difficult. Does the project pass the test of time? Scammy projects don’t pass the test of time often. An ecosystem of developers is a good sign.”

Minutes later, Guillemet said that Ledger is looking to further platformize their product, so that “every single chain can be implemented within the device.”

In terms of Bitcoin developments at Ledger, Guillemet said that they will soon release the ability to run your own full node. Ledger is also working to integrate Tor to protect users’ privacy and release a Bitcoin credit card, to which users will be able to send Bitcoin as collateral for fiat credit.

Guillemet commented that conferences are good for exchanging ideas. “Bitcoin is a crossing point for technology, economics, and geopolitics. If you don’t get that, you don’t understand Bitcoin.

“It’s a paradigm shift. It’s not easy to understand Bitcoin when you come from the fiat monetary system,” he added.

In the event of a hardware wallet know-your-customer (KYC) regulatory crackdown in Europe, Guillemet commented that Ledger would have no choice but to comply. Nonetheless, he wants to ensure the current Ledger users are self sovereign.

He concluded, “For me what is apparent in Bitcoin and cryptocurrency is that if you don’t self custody, there’s no point.”

John Carvalho

John Carvalho is the founder and CEO of Synonym, which develops an ecosystem of applications and protocols for a future hyperbitcoinized world.

Carvalho is a self proclaimed toxic Bitcoin maximalist, meaning he doesn’t believe blockchains outside of Bitcoin are necessary or ethical forms of money. He is also skeptical of attempts to expand the idea of the Lightning Network outside of any non-payment use cases.

When I asked Carvalho how his business accounted for a multichain future, his response was, “By ignoring it.”

“The only people who care about a multichain world are people who are trying to sell you their chain,” he said.

Carvalho first bought Bitcoin in 2012 and attended his first conference in early 2013. “I was basically a full time Bitcoiner two months after getting some.” Over the next few months he plans to attend four Bitcoin conferences.

To be sure, Carvalho is an opinionated, but rational Bitcoiner. In reference to the Bitcoin Conference’s invitation to have him debate Eric Wall in Amsterdam, he commented, “Bitcoin debates should seek truth, not drama.”

“You can’t refute FUD [fear, uncertainty, and doubt]. You can try to rationalize with it, but they will keep changing the angle.”

Imagining his debate with Wall, Carvalho riffed, “You cannot innovate on Bitcoin in a way that compromises censorship resistance. Every shitcoin does that.”

“If the prerequisite for me taking you seriously is I have to accept a censorable blockchain, then the argument is over for me,” he added.

Carvalho opined that Wall, who is not a Bitcoin Maximalist, is coming to Bitcoin Amsterdam to sow seeds of dissent. “I would like to see Bitcoin Magazine not focus on clicks and drama, like every other media outlet.”

Carvalho’s opinion, shared by many maximalists, is that if a business or individual offers their own product on a blockchain that is not Bitcoin, they should not be able to sponsor or get on stage at a Bitcoin conference. “These are business decisions, not Bitcoin decisions.”

The role of Bitcoin conferences, he said, is education and news.

In terms of the near-future outlook for Bitcoin, Carvalho would like “to see something cause Bitcoin to stop correlating with the U.S. stock market."

"It’s really frustrating me," he said. "A lot of the ownership of Bitcoin is still speculators and traders.”

Carvalho concluded, “As a community and as a movement, we need to be promoting the idea of using Bitcoin as long-term savings, while also spending and accepting Bitcoin as a payment method.”


via bitcoinmagazine.com