Translate

Net losses from crypto theft down sharply in Q1 2023 at $322M: Report

Net losses from crypto theft down sharply in Q1 2023 at $322M: Report

A report from app provider De.Fi showed losses from theft down in Q1 2023 compared to last year, along with recovery of funds; Euler accounted for a huge share of both.

Crypto hackers and scammers made off with $452 million in the first quarter of 2023, according to a report released by antivirus and app provider De.Fi. But that is good and bad news, as losses were down from $1.3 billion in the first quarter of 2022. The recovery rate was down too, however.

According to the report, nearly half of the losses this quarter ($215 million) took place in the first three weeks of March. The Euler Finance and Bonq DAO exploits were the quarter’s loss leaders at $196 million and $120 million, respectively. Due to them, the Ethereum blockchain suffered the highest losses, even though Binance outnumbered them with 18 incidents to ten on Ethereum.

The CoinDeal scheme trailed at $45 million in third place, and the Monkey Drainer phishing scammers came in fourth at $16.5 million.

Related: BitKeep completes compensation for $8M APK exploit, announces rebranding 

In the 49 cases examined in the report, six flash loan attacks accounted for the greatest losses at over $200 million, with Euler Finance representing most of the total. Smart contract exploits were the most common type at 17 incidents. Decentralized finance (DeFi) accounted for only five incidents, but it suffered the lion’s share of losses at $336 million.

In the first quarter, $130 million was recovered from the exploits. All of that money was recovered in March and nearly all of it, $129 million, was due to money returned by the Euler Finance hackers. In the first quarter of last year, $520 million had been returned out of $1.3 billion lost, that is, 40% of the stolen funds, compared to 28.7% this year.

While DeFi dominated the losses reported, losses on decentralized exchanges and from crypto tokens and nonfungible tokens likely hit retail users as well. Theft is not uncommon for retail users, and scams affecting them are constantly evolving.

Magazine: US enforcement agencies are turning up the heat on crypto-related crime



via cointelgraph.com
Bitcoin Beach Wallet Renamed To Blink In Addition To Changes Aimed At Making The App Global

Bitcoin Beach Wallet Renamed To Blink In Addition To Changes Aimed At Making The App Global

Blink’s name and features reflect the project’s desire to be used by Bitcoin communities across the world.

The Bitcoin Beach Wallet has officially changed its name to “Blink” to better reflect its vision of becoming the best tool for “bottom-up Bitcoin adoption.” 

The wallet was initially launched in 2020 in El Salvador's El Zonte as part of the Bitcoin Beach project's goal of creating a circular Bitcoin economy. The name change reflects the wallet's expansion beyond its original intended purpose. The wallet has grown to become a popular Lightning wallet for Bitcoin community projects and Lightning enthusiasts worldwide.

Blink plans to enable any user to set their local currency in Q2 2023, making it easier for users to onboard and use bitcoin. The wallet also features in-app Bitcoin education, where users can earn sats for learning about Bitcoin's basics.

Blink also has merchant features that make it easy and flexible for businesses to receive payments over Lightning and on-chain, including LN address, a Lightning cash register, and a printable pay code. Blink also integrates Nostr, making it a go-to custodial wallet for tipping, testing or traveling.

According to Blink's team, "the declared purpose of becoming the best tool for bottom-up Bitcoin adoption has attracted tens of thousands of active users and many requests for features that would increase utility and accessibility across countries and cultures." The team's vision for Blink is for it to be available in every language where there's a Bitcoin community project.

The press release sent to Bitcoin Magazine described how the wallet's name change is significant, as its previous acronym was “problematic.” Blink's new name represents “speed and positivity,” and it will communicate with customers well before changing the name and icon of the app. According to the team, "the name Blink represents the glimmer in the eye of a person who just received their first sats. It's the embodiment of a transaction zapping across the world, connecting two people who never before could transmit value to each other."


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Is a housing crisis underway? Why crypto investors should care

Is a housing crisis underway? Why crypto investors should care

Cointelegraph analyst and writer Marcel Pechman explains if there is a housing crisis underway and why crypto investors should be paying attention.

The show Macro Markets, hosted by crypto analyst Marcel Pechman, which airs every Friday at 12 pm ET on the Cointelegraph Markets & Research YouTube channel, explains complex concepts in layman’s terms and focuses on the cause and effect of traditional financial events on the day-to-day crypto activity.

In today’s episode, Pechman discusses the housing crisis, especially after the United States Case–Shiller Index dropped for the seventh straight month. Increased mortgage rates certainly played a part, considering 15-year financing rose to 5.6% from 3.7% in March 2022. 

However, Pechman explains why commercial properties represent a much more immediate risk, as business rapidly decreases during recessions. Moreover, corporate layoffs usually cause a cascading effect as fewer companies compete for commercial properties.

At the same time, delinquency naturally increases as businesses are forced to refinance their debt at a much higher cost. The video explains how the commercial property crisis could spill into regional banks and cites two multibillion-dollar defaults that occurred over the past couple of months.

During a brief recap, Pechman explains how cryptocurrencies relate to the housing market and why the sector does not provide reliable inflation protection.

The Macro Markets’ next segment focuses on the France–China liquid natural gas (LNG) trade settled directly in yuans, bypassing the U.S. dollar as a global settlement layer. However, Pechman points out how inefficient and unreliable this system is, as commercial banks and companies based in France are not allowed to carry yuans.

The show concludes by showing how Bitcoin (BTC) and cryptocurrencies resemble broader commodities trading, as most of its volume happens in USD. Thus, even if a small part of the trade goes through other currencies, the USD markets retain the indicative price rates.

If you are looking for exclusive and valuable content provided by leading crypto analysts and experts, make sure to subscribe to the Cointelegraph Markets & Research YouTube channel. Join us at Macro Markets every Friday at 12:00 pm ET.



via cointelgraph.com
The US Government Sold Nearly 10,000 Silk Road Bitcoin

The US Government Sold Nearly 10,000 Silk Road Bitcoin

Uncle Sam made off with more than $215 million this month as it began to liquidate portions of seized bitcoin.

The United States government has been selling bitcoin confiscated from the Silk Road case in 2013. 

According to a court filing, the government sold 9,861.1707894 Bitcoin on March 14, 2023, for a total of $215,738,154.98. After transaction fees, the net proceeds for the government were $215,522,416.83. The government also revealed that there are still around 41,490.72 bitcoin left to be sold, which they plan to sell in four more batches over the course of this year.

Previously, the government has auctioned bitcoin, opting instead to proceed with open market sales this time.

The Silk Road was a darknet marketplace that was used to sell drugs, amongst other services. Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road, was convicted in 2015 and sentenced to life in prison. Ulbricht now seeks clemency, as a double life sentence without parole for entirely non-violent charges illustrates the government’s desire to make an example of those who build platforms outside their jurisdiction.

Bitcoin Magazine recently opened an art gallery in Nashville, Tennessee, which currently houses a life-size jail cell Ross Ulbricht exhibit, including art that Ulbricht made in prison, as well as writing from ulbricht.

Bitcoin’s price action as of late has been exciting for those who watched it fall from all-time highs of $69,000, to local lows of less than $16,000. While the government has been selling bitcoin, other institutions like MicroStrategy have been acquiring it.


via bitcoinmagazine.com
What Explains The Recent Uptick In Bitcoin Network Hash Rate?

What Explains The Recent Uptick In Bitcoin Network Hash Rate?

The massive growth in hash rate has some speculating on who’s behind such a sizable increase, plus an update of public bitcoin miners.

The article below is an excerpt from a recent edition of Bitcoin Magazine PRO, Bitcoin Magazine's premium markets newsletter. To be among the first to receive these insights and other on-chain bitcoin market analysis straight to your inbox, subscribe now.


Hash Rate On The Move

The Bitcoin network hash rate is on the move this year, now at an all-time high of 350 EH/s and up 36.7% YTD. Hash rate has been following the surge in price, which is the likely result of more machines coming online at a more profitable price point. In 2022, there was a lot of unused, newer inventory of ASICs that sat idle at lower bitcoin prices and have now made their way onto the network as public miners continued to expand, most noticeably in companies like Marathon Digital Holdings, Riot Platforms and Cipher Mining Technologies.

The surge in hash rate is a result of longer-term investment and expansion decisions that are now materializing after a time lag. As noted, some miners kept their machines on the sidelines while the bitcoin price was lower and less profitable to mine. Another possibility, according to an analysis from Miner Mag, suggests a high share of miner rig imports into the U.S. in January may have played a significant role in the expansion of hash rate. Those shipments have since slowed down, which may indicate an upcoming period of cooling off after this recent hash rate growth. Estimating the breakdown and contributions of factors on why exactly the hash rate is rising is always layered in nuance. 

Average hash rate is growing at a staggering rate.

Hash rate in aggregate continued to steadily rise over the last few months while bitcoin holdings continued to decline. When we use the reported numbers for public miners’ hash rate at the end of February, the 292 EH/s at the end of February and the 350 EH/s online today, we conclude that public miners make up somewhere between 20% to 25% of total network hash rate on a given day. That’s likely a low estimate considering there are some smaller public miners we’re not tracking and public miner data is released periodically.

Public miners make up between 20% to 25% of total network hash rate.
Note: We’ve added more miners to these tables so the total comparison for hash rate over won’t compare perfectly with our historical data. 
Note: We’ve added more miners to these tables so the total comparison for hash rate over won’t compare perfectly with our historical data. 

Many are opining on hash rate hitting all-time highs nearly day after day (when using various moving averages to account for variability), but this level of growth isn’t out of the norm for bitcoin on a historical basis — although it is quite impressive as the absolute level of hash rate reaches numbers almost unfathomable only a few short years ago.

The recent growth of hash rate is not unprecedented.

Three-month hash rate growth is at a staggering 53%. There are only two times that can compare: the 2021 post-China-ban boom in mining and then in 2019, when there was massive growth in network hash rate after new hash rate finally came online after the orders were fulfilled from the previous bull market in 2017 and infrastructure was built out.

While most mining stocks have outperformed bitcoin by a wide margin in 2023, this can generally be attributed to two rather simple factors:Mining equities are much more volatile than bitcoin due to various factors, including:

1. Mining equities are much more volatile than bitcoin due to various factors, including:

  • Public equities trading at a multiple of future cash flows (sat flows anyone?).
  • Potential balance sheet leverage.
  • ASICs and other operational infrastructure being priced as bitcoin derivatives.
  • Much smaller market capitalizations, less global access to capital, more illiquidity.

2. Since the start of the year, price growth has exceeded hash rate growth, meaning hash price has risen. In our mining updates, we often revisit our over-simplified framework for bitcoin mining investing:

  • Hash price bull market = Bitcoin miners outperform bitcoin.
  • Hash price bear market = Bitcoin miners underperform bitcoin.

We use hash price as a simple gauge for investment into the mining market due to the empirical reality that mining revenue will continue to fall (in bitcoin terms) due to the asymptotic supply issuance of bitcoin, coupled with mining difficulty that continues to soar as a result of corresponding hash rate growth. Due to these dynamics, bitcoin performance needs to be adjusted against the relative growth in hash rate. For individual companies, it is important to measure their relative hash rate against network hash rate and mining difficulty. 

Public miners tend to trend down against bitcoin.

The performance of miners denominated in bitcoin closely correlates to the rise in hash price from cycle lows.

Hash price percentages from cycle lows.

Hash price lows are the default in the bitcoin industry. Gains in chip efficiency and a bitcoin exchange rate that continues to trend higher on a long time horizon means that miner revenue per terahash continues to trend lower. This is a feature, not a bug, but it makes bitcoin mining an incredibly difficult industry to invest capital into because of its cutthroat nature.

Hash price percentages from cycle lows.
Total bitcoin miner revenue in USD and BTC.

Final Note:

There has been speculation about the recent jump in hash rate, with some on social media pontificating about a potential operation at the nation state level. Needless to say, we are skeptical of some of these theories. Nearly 100% of the current total hash rate is mining in identifiable mining pools. If a nation state mining operation was being deployed at scale, it is likely they would operate in a sovereign mining pool or one attributed to a specific country outside the United States, whereas many mining pools are made up of miners from all around the world. This assessment may prove incorrect later down the line, and we will be more than willing to admit our misjudgment, but this recent growth doesn’t seem to be a nation state based on the data we are observing.

Most hash rate is in publicly known pools.

A more simple explanation for why the bitcoin hash rate looks to be going parabolic in recent months is that many participants simply forget to set their charts to logarithmic scale.

Average bitcoin hash rate on a log scale.

That concludes the excerpt from a recent edition of Bitcoin Magazine PRO. Subscribe now to receive PRO articles directly in your inbox.

Relevant Articles:


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Crypto news site The Block gets new CEO and reported staff layoffs following admitted ties to SBF

Crypto news site The Block gets new CEO and reported staff layoffs following admitted ties to SBF

The Block reportedly laid off roughly 33% of its staff including interim CEO Bobby Moran in an effort to stabilize the platform following loans it received from Sam Bankman-Fried.

Larry Cermak, vice president of research at The Block, has announced that he will be taking the reins at the crypto and blockchain news website from interim chief executive officer Bobby Moran — the second change in leadership since reports surfaced that former CEO Mike McCaffrey financed the platform through loans from Alameda Research. 

In a March 31 tweet, Cermak said he would be stepping up as CEO after roughly five years at the crypto news site. Axios also reported that The Block laid off roughly 33% of its staff — including Moran — in an effort to stabilize the platform following the controversial loans it received from former FTX and Alameda Research founder Sam Bankman-Fried.

"We are not immune to the contraction of the crypto market, and the economy more broadly," the company reportedly said. "We grew too quickly to capitalize on a bull market in crypto. Now, we must shift our strategy and recalibrate our teams to align with the reality of the current market."

In December 2022, Moran revealed that McCaffrey had used two loans totaling $27 million from Alameda in 2021 in his efforts to restructure the crypto news site. McCaffrey failed to disclose the loans to The Block’s leadership team, a move which led to his resignation as CEO. The Block’s editor-at-large Frank Chaparro, who previously referred to McCaffrey as “literal scum” who betrayed the platform’s staff, lauded Cermak’s advancement to CEO, saying the site was “returning to our crypto native roots”.

Cermak reportedly said he had received no direction from McCaffrey to cover stories about FTX or Bankman-Fried “in any particular way,” despite the platform’s financial ties. All of the news stories on the website include a disclaimer with details about the loans from SBF.

Related: FTX presentation shows ‘massive shortfall’ in firm’s assets

Since FTX filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on Nov. 11, many news outlets, lawmakers, and organizations reported financials ties to the defunct crypto exchange or directly to Bankman-Fried. The firm’s leadership announced in February that it planned to recover all political donations, reporting in March a research team had determined there had been roughly $25 million as of November 2022.

Magazine: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?



via cointelgraph.com
Gamma.io, Xverse And Bitcoin Magazine To Host Ordinals Alley At Miami Bitcoin Conference

Gamma.io, Xverse And Bitcoin Magazine To Host Ordinals Alley At Miami Bitcoin Conference

Bitcoin 2023 will see the world’s first fine art gallery for Bitcoin Ordinal inscriptions, hosted by the three companies.

Disclaimer: BTC Inc. is the parent company of the Bitcoin Conference and Bitcoin Magazine.

Gamma.io, Xverse and Bitcoin Magazine are collaborating to launch an initiative aimed at highlighting the new medium of art, settling on the longest-running and most secure blockchain, Bitcoin.

The three companies will be showcasing emerging visual artists at Bitcoin 2023's Ordinals Alley, which is the first-ever fine art gallery for Bitcoin inscriptions, presented at the world’s largest gathering of Bitcoiners. The conference is taking place in Miami Beach, May 18-20. The gallery's curation is being co-led by Dennis Koch, art gallery director for Bitcoin Magazine, and Hugo Pouchard, art curator and advisor for Gamma and Xverse.

“Ordinals protocol is a remarkable technology empowering artists and their works in the long run. The gallery will explore the evolving relationship between the art world, the medium, and the crypto community," said Pouchard.

In addition, the press release highlights the Artist Open Call, describing it as “an opportunity for rising artists to showcase their work to a global audience.” Six showcased artists will be selected by a curation committee consisting of members from Art Blocks, 6529, Bright Moments, The Medici Collection, and others, with experience in traditional art and auction houses.

Gamma Founder and CEO, Jamil Dhanani said that "Gamma's focus, from day one, has been to empower creators with simple and powerful tools to launch their works on Bitcoin. Together with Xverse, we're bringing even more visibility and exposure to emerging artists from web3, and those interested in Bitcoin for the first time."

Those interested in attending the conference in Miami Beach can purchase tickets at b.tc/conference.


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Bitcoin touches $29K! Why BTC is unaffected by regulatory pressure

Bitcoin touches $29K! Why BTC is unaffected by regulatory pressure

Join us as we discuss the significance of Bitcoin reaching $29,000 and why it seems to be unaffected by all the regulatory pressure and collapsing banks.

In this week’s episode of Market Talks, Cointelegraph welcomes Brent Xu, founder and CEO of Umee — a decentralized finance hub built on the Cosmos SDK that offers tools for macro-level borrowing and lending applications. Before founding Umee, Xu led strategy at Tendermint while setting the strategic roadmap and partnerships for the Cosmos Ecosystem.

We start things off with our main topic for today: Bitcoin (BTC) touched $29,000, a new high for 2023, despite recent United States regulatory crackdowns on crypto firms and related uncertainty. This could also suggest the crypto market does not seem too bothered about the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s lawsuit against Binance and its CEO Changpeng “CZ” Zhao. Even the Crypto Fear & Greed Index — which aims to numerically present the current “emotions and sentiments” toward Bitcoin and other large cryptocurrencies — has been steadily increasing over the last month despite wobbles in the global banking sector. What does all this really mean for the crypto space, though? Should investors not be so worried about regulations?

This week Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Pakistan, Russia, India and Brazil decided to settle trade in their own currencies rather than the United States dollar. Why have they decided to do this, and will it have a significant impact on the U.S. and the dollar? Will there be any ramifications for the crypto space, if any?

We ask Xu what his vision is for how DeFi protocols and crypto exchanges intend to build out their own banking services in the future. Centralized crypto exchanges are under all sorts of pressure from regulators at the moment, yet we still see Fidelity Investments expanding its offerings, and Nasdaq is getting close to launching its crypto custody platform. We also get Xu’s thoughts on Fidelity Investment’s recent expansion.

There is a lot going on at the moment as far as regulations in the crypto space are concerned, mostly cracking down on the crypto sector. We ask Xu what his long-term vision is for the future of the regulated crypto space in the United States.

The United States Federal Reserve seems to be in an unending fight against inflation. The interest rate hikes don’t seem to have an end in sight either. Is the Fed losing its fight? At what point will we see a pause in interest rate hikes, and how realistic is it for the Fed to achieve its objectives for this year?

We cover all this and more, so make sure to stay tuned until the end. Market Talks airs every Thursday at 12:00 pm ET (5:00 pm UTC). Each week, it features interviews with some of the most influential and inspiring people from the crypto and blockchain industry. So, head on over to Cointelegraph Markets & Research’s YouTube page and smash those Like and Subscribe buttons for all our future videos and updates.



via cointelgraph.com
Bitcoin Advocacy Group Illuminates ECB, Eurotower, Encouraging Adoption And Education

Bitcoin Advocacy Group Illuminates ECB, Eurotower, Encouraging Adoption And Education

The "Bitman" collective advocated for Bitcoin adoption by illuminating the ECB building with the Bitcoin logo.

The "Bitman" collective, a group advocating for the adoption of Bitcoin, illuminated the Eurotower and the European Central Bank (ECB) building with the Bitcoin logo and the words “study bitcoin,” on the evening of March 29. 

The goal was to encourage people to inform themselves about Bitcoin and its advantages compared to fiat money. A spokesperson said in a message to Bitcoin Magazine that many institutions, including the ECB, deliberately discredit Bitcoin and knowingly misinform citizens to strengthen their own position. In light of this, it is especially essential to do research using one’s own tools.

The collective believes that Bitcoin has many advantages and that it is vital for people to educate themselves about its benefits. It is a decentralized currency that provides financial freedom to users and can be sent to anyone, anywhere, in the world without any restrictions or intermediaries.

According to a spokesperson, "We want to encourage people to form their own opinion about what we consider to be the best money in the world." The group hopes that illuminating the ECB building and the Eurotower will encourage people to explore Bitcoin's potential and its advantages over fiat money, citing “endthefud.org” as a source for information on Bitcoin that addresses common concerns.


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Gnosis launches Hashi bridge aggregator to help prevent hacks

Gnosis launches Hashi bridge aggregator to help prevent hacks

Bridge protocols LayerZero, Celer, Wormhole, LiFi, and others have already committed to implementing the new protocol.

Gnosis, the team behind Gnosis Safe multi-sig and Gnosis Chain, has launched a hash oracle aggregator for blockchain bridges, according to an announcement from the company. In a conversation with Cointelegraph, Gnosis CEO Martin Köppelmann stated that the new aggregator should make bridges more secure by requiring more than one bridge to validate a withdrawal before it can be confirmed.

Multiple bridge protocols have already committed to integrating with Hashi, including Succinct Labs, DendrETH, ZK Collective, Connext, Celer, LayerZero, Axiom, Wormhole and LI.FI, according to the announcement. 

Over $2 billion was stolen from bridges in 2021 and 2022, according to a report by Token Terminal. Bugs in the code have caused some bridge hacks, whereas others have been caused by the attacker taking over a multi-sig governance wallet.

According to Köppelmann, Hashi can provide the first step towards making these cross-chain transactions more secure throughout the blockchain ecosystem, by requiring withdrawals to be validated by multiple bridges instead of just one:

Hashi is about essentially creating this aggregator that can use different bridges and basically say they all need to agree to the same message [...] If they do, great, then we can be really, really certain that this message is actually real and if they disagree [...] Then we know we need to escalate to governance, we need to halt the bridge.

Köppelmann also emphasized that Hashi helps to prevent multi-sig governance attacks because it allows a protocol to prevent governance from intervening if there is no disagreement between individual bridges.

“Here you can have this nice tradeoff where you say ‘the governance is not allowed to do anything,’ so it cannot interfere with the system unless there is explicitly a conflict or a bug," he explained. "So as soon as those bridges that are supposed to report on the same thing [...] Disagree, well then governance is allowed to interfere, otherwise governance has no role. That’s Hashi.”

Related: Uniswap’s BNB deployment should use multiple bridges, claims LIFI CEO

Hashi is open source and available on GitHub.

The idea of a multi-bridge aggregator rose to prominence during the Uniswap bridge debate in December and January. Although Wormhole was ultimately chosen as Uniswap’s bridge provider, representatives from Celer, LiFi, and deBridge, as well as other participants concluded that a multi-bridge aggregation solution needed to be implemented going forward.



via cointelgraph.com
Terra co-founder Do Kwon's jail time in Montenegro will be harsh: Report

Terra co-founder Do Kwon's jail time in Montenegro will be harsh: Report

Now in custody in Montenegro, Do Kwon could be facing "at least a year" behind bars as the country considers extradition requests, according to one criminal defense lawyer.

Do Kwon, currently in custody in Montenegro and potentially awaiting extradition to the United States or South Korea, will reportedly face harsh conditions in the country’s penal system.

According to a March 29 Protos report, an unnamed criminal defense lawyer said conditions at Montenegro’s jails and prisons “haven’t changed” from those described in a 2020 human rights report from the U.S. State Department. The report cited a case in which prison officers had been convicted of torturing and “inflicting grievous bodily harm” on 11 inmates in 2015, as well as other “poor” conditions in some of Montenegro’s prisons due to overcrowding and lack of medical care.

Citing reports from the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture, the State Department said many prisoners had been confined to overcrowded cells for roughly 23 hours a day, with some reports of violence between inmates. Kwon could be facing “at least a year” in such conditions as Montenegro considers extradition requests, depending on the outcome of his criminal case over allegedly forged travel documents.

“Rooms are 8 meters squared and very crowded,” the lawyer reportedly said. “There’s about 10 to 11 people in a room — there’s usually not even a bed.“

This is a developing story, and further information will be added as it becomes available.



via cointelgraph.com
Kraken aims for restricted dealer registration in Canada to comply with new rules

Kraken aims for restricted dealer registration in Canada to comply with new rules

In February, Canadian Securities Administrators announced enhanced investor protection requirements for crypto asset traders.

Crypto exchange Kraken has filed a preregistration undertaking with the Ontario Securities Commission in Canada seeking restricted dealer status. United States-based Kraken is already active in Canada and is acting to comply with the new guidance.

Kraken is registered in Canada as a money services business and has been operating there for over 10 years. The Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) implemented new guidance for crypto asset trading platforms on Feb. 22, requiring Kraken to file a preregistration undertaking legally committing it to observe new investor protections.

The new requirements for crypto trading platforms will be subject to include new custody standards, restrictions on the use of leverage and a ban on trading stablecoins without prior written consent from the CSA. Kraken managing director for Canada Mark Greenberg said:

“We want both existing and prospective clients to know Kraken remains committed to Canada.”

Restricted dealer registration is “a special kind of dealing registration used for firms that do not quite fit under any other category” under CSA definitions. Regulators tailor requirements for firms with this status individually.

Cryptocurrency exchange OKX announced on March 20 that it would stop providing service to Canadian customers within three months due to “new regulations.” OKX added that its withdrawal from the country was temporary and it was working with regulators.

Related: G7 to collaborate on tighter crypto regulation: Report

The CSA is the umbrella organization for Canada’s 13 regional securities regulators. There is no federal Canadian regulator. Registration by one CSA member provides a so-called “passport” for firms doing business in other provinces or territories.

In February, Kraken paid $30 million in penalties and disgorgement in the United States after the Securities and Exchange Commission charged it with failing to register its staking-as-a-service program as a security. Kraken said at the time that it would continue to offer its staking program to non-U.S. customers.

Magazine: Best and worst countries for crypto taxes — Plus crypto tax tips



via cointelgraph.com
Sam Bankman-Fried is paying for legal defense using previously gifted funds from Alameda: Report

Sam Bankman-Fried is paying for legal defense using previously gifted funds from Alameda: Report

The former FTX CEO reportedly gave Joseph Bankman roughly $10 million funded by a loan from Alameda Research as a part of a lifetime estate and gift tax exemption.

Former FTX chief executive officer Sam Bankman-Fried, also known as SBF, is reportedly funding the legal team defending him against federal charges with millions of dollars he gifted his father from Alameda Research.

According to a March 29 Forbes report citing sources with “operational knowledge” of FTX and Alameda, in 2021 Bankman-Fried gave his father at least $10 million that was funded by a loan from Alameda. The former FTX CEO sent the funds to his father, Joseph Bankman — a Stanford Law professor who has stopped teaching classes amid his son’s legal troubles — as part of a lifetime estate and gift tax exemption.

Bankman-Fried’s defense team consists of Mark Cohen and Christian Everdell of the law firm Cohen & Gresser, whom the former FTX CEO reportedly retained prior to his extradition to the United States in December. Though SBF remains free on bail at the time of publication, many of his in-person court appearances since his arraignment have focused on potentially restricting these conditions. A judge recently ordered Bankman-Fried be prohibited from using a smartphone with internet access.

Amid the collapse of FTX and Bankman-Fried’s subsequent arrest, members of his family including his father, mother, and close associates have become embroiled in the situation with the crypto exchange. Bankman reportedly retained his own attorney in January, and he and others have been named in potential subpoenas for FTX’s bankruptcy case.

Related: Sam Bankman-Fried petitions court to prioritize reimbursing his legal fees

SBF faced 12 criminal counts following a superseding indictment from federal prosecutors in February, which was amended to 13 on March 28 following allegations he used $40 million to bribe a Chinese government official. Other charges include conspiracy counts related to fraud as well as those for wire fraud and securities fraud. Bankman-Fried entered a not guilty plea in December, with the trial scheduled to begin in October 2023.

Magazine: SBF legal fees, BTC market cap flips Meta and USDC climbs back to $1: Hodler’s Digest, March 12-18



via cointelgraph.com
How to mitigate the security risks associated with crypto payments

How to mitigate the security risks associated with crypto payments

Learn how to mitigate security risks associated with crypto payments through methods such as hardware wallets and secure exchanges.

How can privacy-preserving tech help prevent crypto payment risks in Web3?

Technologies, such as zero-knowledge proofs, homomorphic encryption and multi-party computation, that guarantee privacy can reduce the risks associated with crypto payments on Web3 by safeguarding the private data exchanged during transactions.

Public blockchains — which are open and available to everyone — are frequently used to process cryptocurrency payments in Web3. This indicates that it is simple to track and keep an eye on payment information, such as sender and recipient addresses and transaction amounts. To address this issue, privacy-preserving technologies can help secure the users’ private data.

While homomorphic encryption allows computations to be conducted on encrypted data, keeping the information secret, zero-knowledge proofs enable the verification of transaction information without disclosing the underlying data.

The privacy of cryptographic payments in Web3 can also be improved by the use of multi-party computation. With the help of this technology, many parties can jointly compute their data without disclosing any private data to one another. This minimizes the possibility of a data breach by ensuring that no one party has access to all the payment information.

Furthermore, fraud prevention and threat protection can also be accomplished with the help of privacy-preserving technologies. For instance, by using secure multi-party computation, parties can jointly verify the legitimacy of a payment transaction before it is completed, ensuring that all parties involved are legitimate and the payment is secure.

How do you mitigate crypto payment risks?

Crypto payments come with inherent risks, such as the potential loss of funds due to theft or fraud. To mitigate these risks, it is essential to take steps to protect your cryptocurrency assets.

To purchase or sell cryptocurrencies, users must choose a trusted exchange that offers security. Before using the exchange, do some research to make sure it is regulated by the appropriate authorities and has a proven track record of security. 

Similarly, make sure to only use payment gateways that are licensed and regulated by reputable authorities to ensure that your funds are safe. It is also important to research the reputation and track record of the payment gateway before using it to ensure that it has a history of secure and reliable service.

Also, one must store their holdings in a safe wallet that supports two-factor authentication and high encryption. To safeguard one’s wallet and other accounts connected to cryptocurrency transactions, users should keep their software updated and use strong passwords and two-factor authentication.

Before finalizing the transaction, double-check the transaction’s specifics, including the recipient’s address and the transferred amount. Beware of phishing scams and public WiFi networks that might jeopardize your information.

Last but not least, one may adopt a hardware wallet, which adds another level of protection from cyberattacks by keeping one’s private keys offline. Maintaining up-to-date knowledge of the market’s most recent developments, such as security concerns and legislative changes, is another crucial step. Check the news and updates from reliable sources on a regular basis to make sure you are informed of any new risks or possibilities.

What are the security risks of using cryptocurrency as payment?

There are various security vulnerabilities associated with using cryptocurrencies as payment methods, including the possibility of theft, hacks and fraud. For instance, hackers can take advantage of flaws in exchanges, wallets and transactions. Additionally, consumers who are the targets of scams or fraudulent transactions have little redress because cryptocurrency transactions are irreversible.

The possibility of loss or theft is one of the biggest worries. Digital wallets, where cryptocurrencies are kept, are susceptible to hacking attempts, phishing scams and other cyberattacks. The money kept in a compromised wallet may be taken, and it can be difficult to get it back. Additionally, because cryptocurrency transactions are irreversible, the funds cannot be recovered if they are sent to an incorrect address or the wallet is compromised.

The possibility of fraud is another security issue concerned with cryptocurrency payments. In order to deceive consumers into sending money to what seems like correct addresses, hackers can make phony websites or copy trusted websites. This is a phishing attempt, and because the false website is identical to the real one, it can be difficult to spot. Moreover, hackers have the ability to fabricate fake cryptocurrency exchanges or wallets in order to steal money from unwary customers.

To steal a user’s digital assets, cybercriminals may try to use flaws in their computer or smartphone. To access a user’s digital wallet, they can employ a variety of techniques, such as phishing emails, spyware, ransomware and other cyberattacks.

Cybercriminals frequently use phishing emails to lure people into clicking on malicious links or downloading risky files. The attacker gains access to a user’s digital assets after they click the link or download the file. Malware — e.g, crypto mining malware — is yet another approach that hackers frequently employ. Malware is intended to harm, interfere with or steal data from a computer system. It can be installed on a user’s computer through various means, including phishing emails, fake software updates and drive-by downloads.

Ransomware encrypts user files and makes them inaccessible. After that, the assailant demands a ransom in return for the decryption key. There is no guarantee that the user will get the decryption key if they pay the ransom, and their digital assets could end up being permanently lost.

Lastly, there is a risk of regulatory uncertainty. The regulation of cryptocurrencies is still limited, and they have different legal standing in every nation. As a result, consumers have little protection at their disposal, and pursuing legal action in the event of theft or fraud can be challenging. As a result, people who use cryptocurrencies as payment methods need to be cautious and take the right security precautions to safeguard their money.

What are the several types of blockchain attacks?

Due to its decentralized and distributed structure, blockchain technology is intended to be secure and resistant to attacks. However, it is not completely immune to attacks, and many different types of blockchain attacks have been identified, including 51% attacks, double-spend attacks, sybil attacks and DDoS attacks. 

A 51% attack is one of the most frequent styles of blockchain attacks. In this attack, an attacker has control over more than 50% of the computational power of the blockchain network, giving them the ability to alter transactions and add fake transactions to existing blocks.

A double-spend attack is another form of blockchain assault where an attacker manipulates the consensus mechanism of the blockchain network to spend the same coin twice. Smaller blockchain networks with fewer nodes are more likely to experience this assault, making them more susceptible to manipulation.

Another typical form of blockchain attack is known as a sybil attack, in which the attacker sets up numerous fictitious identities or nodes in order to take over the network. The blockchain’s history can then be changed by using these false identities to control transactions.

Finally, there are distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks, in which a perpetrator floods the blockchain network with traffic and blocks the processing of valid transactions. Smaller blockchain networks with fewer resources to protect against DDoS attacks are particularly vulnerable to these attacks.

Therefore, it is essential for blockchain networks to implement robust security measures and be vigilant against these types of attacks to maintain the integrity of the blockchain network.



via cointelgraph.com
In The Face Of Banking Crisis, The Bitcoin Price Rise Is Proving Us Right

In The Face Of Banking Crisis, The Bitcoin Price Rise Is Proving Us Right

The bitcoin price, rising in the face of an ongoing banking crisis, appears to vindicate what Bitcoiners have known all along.

This is an opinion editorial by Robert Hall, a content creator and small business owner.

The events of the last few weeks have spooked investors and regional banks alike. More importantly, the people who go to work and make the economy run are starting to question whether their bank deposits are safe. Fears of more bank runs after the collapses of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Signature Bank, Silvergate Bank and Credit Suisse are rampant.

And these fears are not unfounded, if you ask me. For instance, when you turn on the TV and see that First Republic needs a $30 billion bailout to stay afloat, it doesn’t inspire confidence in the banking system. And more banking chaos could come. Legendary investor Michael Burry believes that two more banks could be in trouble in Comerica Bank and U.S Bancorp. Essentially, these banks are in the same position that SVB was in. The likelihood of more bank bailouts seems to be increasing by the day.

To top it all off, federal regulators are studying the possibility of insuring all bank deposits in the entire banking system. There are approximately $19 trillion in bank deposits in the banking system. Any talk of insuring the bank deposits of every bank in America is insane and outright dangerous. Talk about throwing more fuel on the fire. I think this would make people more worried about their money and spur more bank runs. The government and the Federal Reserve are playing with fire.

The Federal Reserve is reacting to situations instead of being clear headed and planning ahead. This will lead to overreaction and implementing policies that could do more harm than good. It’s crazy that the fate of the entire economy is in the hands of people like Janet Yellen, Jerome Powell and Joe Biden.

Do you sleep like a baby at night knowing these people are in charge of the economic fate of the planet? How we got to this place is well documented, and there is no reason to go into detail, but taking a step back makes you realize what a precarious situation we are in right now.

Source

Thank God For Bitcoin

I want to be the first to say in chaotic times like this: “Thank God we have Bitcoin.” We have certainty that our money is our money. There is no third party that is going to f*ck with it and inflate its value away. There are no third parties that can stop you from accessing it. No one can stop you from spending it on what you want or sending it to whomever you choose.

For the first time in history, the power to transact is truly in the hands of the people. Bitcoin is the most innovative monetary technology ever created. This realization is starting to dawn on people as more people flock to the safety of Bitcoin during times of turbulence.

The bitcoin price has ripped higher on the news of these recent bank collapses. As of this writing, in the last 14 days alone, the price of bitcoin has shot up 28.8 percent. This is a massive move in a matter of two weeks. Is it safe to say that bitcoin is becoming a risk-off asset in the eyes of the average consumer? It is certainly trending that way.

Bitcoiners already know this to be true; we are simply waiting for everyone to play catch-up in real time. As of the writing of this article, the price is just north of $28,000, and in all likelihood, won’t stay there for long if news of more bank failures comes to pass.

As a Bitcoiner, it is nice for more people to realize what we have come to about Bitcoin and start to save their wealth in bitcoin. On the other hand, I didn’t want it to happen in such a way that it endangers the entire global economy.

Some believe bitcoin will reach $1 million in the next 90 days! What a time to be alive, right?

Source

Events will happen the way they are supposed to happen; the best thing we can do as Bitcoiners is to continue to spread the word about Bitcoin to anyone who will listen and continue to stack sats accordingly.

“There are decades where nothing happens, and there are weeks where decades happen.”

Vladimir Lenin.

Not that I like quoting dead communists, but I feel like this is appropriate for the times we are living in. 2023 could end up being a consequential year for Bitcoin and the globe. Buckle up. It’s going to be a wild ride.

This is a guest post by Robert Hall. Opinions expressed are entirely their own and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.


via bitcoinmagazine.com
Binance concealed ties to China for years, even after 2017 crypto crackdown: Report

Binance concealed ties to China for years, even after 2017 crypto crackdown: Report

Documents reviewed by the Financial Times show that Binance kept staff and operations in China despite announcing its departure in 2017.

Binance CEO Changpeng "CZ" Zhao and other senior executives have been for years concealing the crypto exchange ties with China, according to documents obtained by the Financial Times.

In a report on March 29, FT claims that Binance had substantial ties to China for several years, contrary to the company's claims that it left the country after a 2017 ban on crypto, including an office still in use by the end of 2019 and a Chinese bank used to pay employees.

“We no longer publish our office addresses . . . people in China can directly say that our office is not in China,” Zhao reportedly said in a company message group in November 2017.

Employees were told in 2018 that wages would be paid through a Shanghai-based bank. A year later, personnel on payroll in China were required to attend tax sessions in an office based in the country, according to FT.

Based on the messages, Binance employees discussed a media report that claimed the company would open an office in Beijing in 2019. “Reminder: publicly, we have offices in Malta, Singapore, and Uganda. [...] Please do not confirm any offices anywhere else, including China.”

The report backs up accusations made in a lawsuit filed on March 27 by the United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) against the exchange, claiming that Binance obscured the location of its executive offices, as well as the “identities and locations of the entities operating the trading platform.”

Related: Here’s why CFTC suing Binance is a bigger deal than an SEC enforcement

According to the lawsuit, Zhao stated in an internal Binance memo that the policy was intended to “keep countries clean [of violations of law]” by “not landing .com anywhere. This is the main reason .com does not land anywhere.”

In response to the FT report, a Binance spokesperson told Cointelegraph that the company "does not operate in China nor do we have any technology, including servers or data, based in China," adding that "we strongly reject assertions to the contrary." They continued: "To be clear, the Chinese government, like any other government, has no access to Binance data except where we are responding to lawful and legitimate law enforcement requests."

Binance spokesperson also stated:

"While we did have a customer service call center based in China to service global Mandarin speakers, those employees who wished to remain with the company were offered relocation assistance starting in 2021." 

According to the exchange, anonymous sources are citing ancient history and "dramatically mischaracterizing events. This is not an accurate picture of Binance’s operations."

With daily trading volume of over $8.5 billion, Binance is the world's largest cryptocurrency exchange. The company claims it has never been registered or incorporated in China and does not operate there. Its 8,000 full-time employees live across Europe, the Americas, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, according to Binance.

Magazine: 4 out of 10 NFT sales are fake: Learn to spot the signs of wash trading



via cointelgraph.com
Bitcoin mining stocks underwhelm in March, but brighter days could be around the corner

Bitcoin mining stocks underwhelm in March, but brighter days could be around the corner

In March mining stocks increased at a slower pace compared to BTC, amid macroeconomic uncertainty and increasing competition among Bitcoin miners.

Bitcoin mining stocks had a dull performance in March, with small moves here and there that followed BTC's price movement. While it is encouraging to see that most stocks held onto their impressive January gains, Bitcoin's price action will be crucial for the short-to-medium-term performance of these stocks.

Additionally, the expansion of the public Bitcoin mining sector in the U.S. continues as American miners reported one of the biggest ASIC imports in January 2023. The delivery of new machines and an increase in the BTC price led to a surge in the network's hashrate to new all-time highs. Miners' incomes, however, are subdued by the rising network difficulty.

Mining stocks are in wait-and-see mode

Despite Bitcoin’s recent 18% rally, subdued performances of most mining stocks can be attributed to the uncertainty around the sustainability of Bitcoin’s price rally and the increasing competition in the mining industry. The Hashrate Index, a proxy for Bitcoin mining stocks, increased 10% in March from 1,929 to 2,141 points.

The median monthly gain in the top ten mining stocks is 0.30%, with an average of 5.21%. Riot Platforms and Cipher Mining led the monthly gains across the sector with a 28.64% and 24.34% rise. CleanSpark, Inc. and Bitfarms Ltd. were the worst performers, with negative 6.52% and 5.79% moves.

The performance of the top ten Bitcoin mining stocks as of March 28.

The average Q1 2023 gains across the top ten Bitcoin mining stocks is 128%. These shares yielded the majority of their Q1 2023 gains in January. The following months, February and March, saw a muted performance from most mining company stocks.

The chart of Marathon Digital’s stock perfectly illustrates the price action across the industry, with a tall candle in January, followed by small moves in the next couple of months.

MARA/USD monthly price chart. Source: TradingView

Currently, mining firms are focused on expanding and sustaining their operations rather than profits. Marathon Digital increased its mining capacity by 30% in February. The firm’s aggressive expansion will increase its production capacity from 9.5 EH/s to 23 EH/s by mid-2023.

At the same time, Canadian mining firm Hut 8 Mining Corporations announced a merger with the U.S.-based Bitcoin Corp to combine their resources and weather the downturn across the industry.

The network’s hashrate soared as new ASICs flood the market

The Bitcoin network’s hashrate increased to an all-time high of 348 exahash per second (EH/s) from 320 EH/s in the last week of March.

The revenue of miners jumped around 30% after the recent rise in BTC price, increasing from $65 per petahash per sec (PH/s) per day in Q4 2022 to around $85 per PH/s per day in Q1 2023. However, Bitcoin’s price jumped over 60% during the same period.

The increase in Bitcoin’s price is only part of the reason behind the hashrate surge. The discrepancy in miner incomes can be attributed to the increasing mining difficulty. It was mainly due to the delivery of new machines across America, which increased the network’s processing power and difficulty.

In January 2023, U.S. miners reportedly imported 1,555 tons of machines, which has propelled the network’s hashrate to its current peak.

Related: Crypto mining in 2023 — Is it still worth it? Watch Market Talks

Bitcoin monthly estimate of miner shipments and the network’s hashrate. Source: TheMinerMag

The rise in the network’s hashrate has limited the revenue of miners, which may adversely affect miners' incomes if BTC prices were to fall from here.

There’s a probability that the network’s hashrate could plateau around current levels. The MinerMag report added:

"If there’s no major uptick in the shipment gross weight in the rest of March and into April, the growth rate of bitcoin’s network hashrate may gradually slow down.”

Bitcoin’s price performance will continue to play a significant role in the growth of the mining sector, but BTC price must sustain its current level or move higher for positive revenues and a continued uptrend in public stocks.

The views, thoughts and opinions expressed here are the authors’ alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.



via cointelgraph.com
North Korean hackers using stolen crypto to mine more crypto via cloud services: Report

North Korean hackers using stolen crypto to mine more crypto via cloud services: Report

Cybersecurity firm Mandiant has “graduated” a new group of hackers who finance state goals and their own existence with the help of crypto laundering.

The North Korean cybercrime operator APT43 is using cloud computing to launder cryptocurrency, a report from cybersecurity service Mandiant has found. According to the researchers, the North Korean group uses “stolen crypto to mine for clean crypto.”

Mandiant, a Google subsidiary, has been tracking the North Korean Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) group since 2018 but has only now “graduated” the group to an independent identity. Mandiant characterized the group as a “major player” that often cooperated with other groups.

Although its main activity was spying on South Korea, Mandiant found that APT43 was likely engaged in raising funds for the North Korean regime and funding itself through its illicit operations. Apparently the group has been successful in those pursuits:

“APT43 steals and launders enough cryptocurrency to buy operational infrastructure in a manner aligned with North Korea’s juche state ideology of self-reliance, therefore reducing fiscal strain on the central government.”

The researchers detected the North Korean group’s “likely use of hash rental and cloud mining services to launder stolen cryptocurrency into clean cryptocurrency.”

Hash rental and cloud mining are similar practices that involve renting crypto mining capacity. According to Mandiant, they make it possible to mine crypto “to a wallet selected by the buyer without any blockchain-basedassociation to the buyer’s original payments.”

Mandiant identified payment methods, aliases, and addresses used for purchases by the group. PayPal, American Express cards and “Bitcoin likely derived from previous operations” were the payment methods the group used.

Related: South Korea sets independent sanctions for crypto theft against North Korea

In addition, APT43 was implicated in the use of Android malware to harvest credentials of people in China looking for cryptocurrency loans. The group also operates several spoof sites for the targeted credential harvesting.

North Korea has been implicated in numerous crypto heists, including the recent Euler exploit of over $195 million. According to the United Nations, North Korean hackers had a record haul of between $630 million and more than $1 billion in 2022. Chainalysis put that figure at a minimum of $1.7 billion.

Magazine: Justin Sun vs. SEC, Do Kwon arrested, 180M player game taps Polygon: Asia Express



via cointelgraph.com
Circle announces USDC launch for Cosmos via Noble network

Circle announces USDC launch for Cosmos via Noble network

The stablecoin will be launched on the Noble network, making it available to all 50-plus Cosmos IBC blockchains.

USD Coin (USDC) will soon be available in the Cosmos ecosystem via the Noble network, according to a blog post from the Noble development team. The post was shared on Twitter by USDC issuer Circle.

Neither Circle nor Noble gave out a specific date for USDC’s launch on the network, but both said that readers should “stay tuned.”

In its announcement, the Noble team said that USDC will be the first “native, fiat-backed stablecoin that is highly liquid and fully collateralized” on a Cosmos Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol-connected network. In its view, the introduction of the fiat-backed stablecoin will solve many of the challenges that Cosmos users currently have when trying to bridge assets from one network to another, explaining:

“This integration will catalyze hundreds of millions of dollars in liquidity over the coming months in Cosmos, and will seek to rectify the challenges that users and appchains face when interacting with bridged assets sourced from other ecosystems. […] Every blockchain needs a canonical and fungible version of USDC, and Noble exists to fulfill this critical need.”

Related: Mastercard to settle transactions for USDC in APAC

According to an explanation on the official Cosmos website, Cosmos is an interconnected web of blockchain networks that use the Tendermint Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus protocol, Application Blockchain Interface and Cosmos Software Development Kit. The networks are connected through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC), allowing them to move assets between networks within the overall Cosmos ecosystem.

Noble is one of more than 50 networks in the Cosmos IBC ecosystem, according to Mintscan.

In January, Injective Protocol launched a $150 million fund to promote user adoption of the Cosmos ecosystem. It was backed by Kraken Ventures, Pantera Capital, Jump Crypto and other firms known for investing in blockchain projects. In February, the Cosmos Interchain Foundation allocated another $40 million to develop core infrastructure and applications for the ecosystem.



via cointelgraph.com
Crypto-friendly banks mismanaged traditional risks, FDIC head tells Senate hearing

Crypto-friendly banks mismanaged traditional risks, FDIC head tells Senate hearing

It all started with FTX, FDIC head Martin Gruenberg said; he emphasized that the American banking system remains sound.

The United States Senate Banking Committee held a hearing March 28 on the regulatory response to recent bank failures. Officials from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Federal Reserve and Treasury testified. FDIC chair Martin Gruenberg spoke about the causes of the failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank, including the role of digital assets, and the agency’s responses to the crisis.

High levels of uninsured deposits and rapid growth were common factors in the bank collapses in March, Gruenberg said. Gruenberg’s narrative began with the closing of digital-asset-focused Silvergate Bank, announced on March 8, although that story began with the bankruptcy of FTX.

FTX represented less than 10% of Silvergate Bank’s total deposits, but the bank lost 68% of its deposits in the aftermath of FTX's bankruptcy, setting off a fatal chain of events for the bank. Gruenberg said:

“The troubles experienced by Silvergate Bank demonstrated how traditional banking risks, […] When not managed adequately, could combine to lead to a bad outcome.”

FDIC was informed of the run on SVB on the evening of Thursday, March 9. SVB closed on March 10 and FDIC worked with the bank throughout the weekend, succeeding in reopening the bridge bank the following Monday. Gruenberg noted that, like Silvergate Bank, SVB had concentrated its activities in a single sector — venture capital firms.

Related: Adoption and nerves — Crypto pumps amid banking crisis

Signature Bank was more diversified than Silvergate Bank or SVB. That was partly because of the bank’s decision to reduce its exposure to digital assets after the FTX bankruptcy and media scrutiny of the bank’s ties to the crypto exchange. The bank received more negative attention related to FTX in February, when it was sued for allegedly facilitating FTX’s commingling of accounts.

Deposit outflows from Signature Bank began March 9 and became acute the following day, Friday, with about 20% of deposits being withdrawn in hours. Management was unable to provide accurate financial data and the situation deteriorated:

“Resolution of the negative balance required a prolonged joint effort among Signature Bank, regulators, and the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York to pledge collateral and obtain the necessary funding from the Federal Reserve’s Discount Window to cover the negative outflows.”

"This was accomplished with minutes to spare before the Federal Reserve’s wire room closed,” Gruenberg added.

Gruenberg noted that Silvergate Bank and Signature Bank used digital platforms that made it possible to carry out transactions round-the-clock. They were “the only two known platforms of this type within U.S. insured institutions.”

Gruenberg gave a preliminary estimate of $22.5 billion for the cost to the Deposit Insurance Fund for resolving SVB and Signature Bank losses. He added, echoing several government officials in recent days, that:

“The state of the U.S. financial system remains sound despite recent events.”

FDIC will release a comprehensive report on the deposit insurance system; FDIC's chief risk officer will release a report on the corporation’s supervision of Signature Bank by May 1. In addition, FDIC will issue a proposal on new rulemaking on the special assessment that month.

The other speakers at the hearing gave briefer testimony. Treasury Under Secretary for Domestic Finance Nellie Liang described how the Treasury engaged with FDIC and the Federal Reserve during the bank failures. Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michael S. Barr discussed in fairly technical terms the failure of SVB and the subsequent steps taken by the government.

Magazine: Can you trust crypto exchanges after the collapse of FTX?



via cointelgraph.com
Federal Prosecutors Charge Sam Bankman-Fried With Attempt To Bribe Chinese Officials With $40 Million

Federal Prosecutors Charge Sam Bankman-Fried With Attempt To Bribe Chinese Officials With $40 Million

In a new indictment unsealed on Tuesday, officials charged Sam-Bankman Fried with bribing Chinese officials to release frozen assets.

Federal prosecutors have accused Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), former CEO of failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, of attempting to bribe “one or more” Chinese government officials with $40 million, the goal being to release $1 billion worth of frozen digital assets belonging to his hedge fund, Alameda Research. 

Bankman-Fried is already facing eight criminal counts of fraud and conspiracy and has not yet been arraigned on five others. He could face more than 155 years in prison if convicted on all counts — the trial has been scheduled for October.

The new indictment against Bankman-Fried, unsealed by the Southern District Court of New York on Tuesday, alleges that Bankman-Fried devised fraudulent schemes to steal deposits from FTX with the aim of financing risky bets at Alameda Research. In addition, SBF contributed to American politicians without proper documentation, all while living in the Bahamas. FTX’s collapse and subsequent bankruptcy left the industry reeling, as it was once one of the largest and most trusted exchanges.

SBF remains under house arrest at his parents’ home in Palo Alto, California, with restricted movements. Three of his former business partners, including FTX co-founder Gary Wang and Alameda Research CEO Caroline Ellison, have already pleaded guilty to their respective charges.

On Tuesday, Judge Lewis A. Kaplan approved a modification to Bankman-Fried’s bail terms to limit his access to the internet. This move followed concerns about his use of a virtual private network, which masks the location of an internet connection. Bankman-Fried will be allowed to use a VPN only to access a database to help prepare his defense, via a laptop provided by his lawyers according to the modification.


via bitcoinmagazine.com